English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

and i didnt want to as i dont agree with the police keeping d..n.a samples of everyone, how would they force me to give one ?

if i was touched in anyway shape or form wouldnt it be classed as abuse ?

2007-05-28 21:38:23 · 25 answers · asked by bigsexydug 4 in Politics & Government Law Enforcement & Police

dont know why but whenever i ask a question about the police everyone seems to think ive done something , i know about police because im never in trouble im a good guy.

how would they actually get the d.n.a sample without you opening your mouth etc for a swab, as i doubt they would get a policeman to force open your mouth nowadays to take one.

i simply dont like the idea of d.n.a of everyone (especially mine ) on a computer, as i think it is morally wrong

2007-05-28 22:00:21 · update #1

25 answers

In the past before a DNA sample could be taken you needed to be arrested for an offence. Under the recent changes to the law the police are entitled to take your DNA even if you are not charged for an offence. As I understand it if you refuse to give a sample there is a £500 fine that they can charge you.
This is one of a very few countries where the police have such far reaching powers. There will come a time in the not to distant future when the police will have DNA profiles on most if not all UK nationals.
This allows them to carry out very lazy policing as once the register is completed they will very quickly be able to scan the register to look for matches.
DNA is currently held as the golden child if policing as currently there are not major criminal cases were the use of DNA has failed to secure a conviction.
Unless the general public start to resist this incursion on our civil liberties we will soon be in a police state where the police have the right to carry out investigations built on the suspect having to defend them self's against technology and not good policing.
Viva the revolution.

2007-05-28 21:52:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Assuming you are in UK, yes a sample can be taken by force. Two types of sample can be taken: a mouth swab or hair. A mouth swab is painless (unless you've got an ulcer on the inside of your cheek) but would not be taken if force had to be used (important rule - never put your fingers near anybody's mouth if they're trying to fight you). If force were necessary, hair would be taken. At least three hairs including the roots have to be taken to get an adequate sample. Strangely enough PACE does not say anything about head hairs so the sample could theoretically be taken from anywhere - you'd have to have a very good reason to taken pubic hair purely for a DNA sample although it could be taken as an evidential sample for rape.
Yes it is an assault but it is a lawful assault as the Act allows force to be used. The force however would have to be reasonable.

2007-05-28 23:56:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

i'm afraid you're all incorrect. The police DO have the flexibility to take your fingerprints and DNA returned subsequently, offering it is not longer than one month with the aid of fact you have been charged. See s63 Police and criminal info Act 1984 which states: 63A(4) Any constable could, in the allowed era, require a individual who's neither in police detention nor held in custody by potential of the police on the authority of a courtroom to attend a police station as a manner to have a pattern taken the place: (a) the guy has been charged with/won a warning or very final warning for, or counseled that they are going to be reported for a recordable offence and the two have not had a pattern taken from them for the time of the analyze or has a pattern so taken yet the two it became into not appropriate or the pattern proved inadequate you're able to desire to take transport of 7 days wherein to attend yet i'm afraid in case you do not teach you're able to be arrested. no person's attempting to physique you with something - the officer's basically doing his interest and making a criminal requirement of you nevertheless it sounds like he could not be going approximately it in the perfect way. VDV - it is not suitable that he hasn't been convicted or counseled, he basically needs to have been charged which he has already admitted he has been. no count if he became into later convicted is beside the point.

2016-10-30 01:31:35 · answer #3 · answered by Erika 4 · 0 0

The Police do have a power in law to take samples by force if necessary.

I personally don't like to though because it just makes things more difficult and painful for the person who resists.

We have various techniques to get compliance, all of which are governed by the powers given to us in law so we can't do what we want. Most use pain compliance.

What we do in the course of our job has to be proportionate, legal, accountable and necessary.

I've seen many people try to resist the taking of samples but all of them lose and I've had more fights with people in the Police station than I have outside of it.

I personally don't like fighting with people but some people won't listen to reason and it's the only language they understand.

As for not agreeing with the Police keeping the samples, the government make the laws, the Police just enforce them but if you've got nothing to hide, you've got nothing to worry about.

2007-05-29 07:26:37 · answer #4 · answered by Ian UK 6 · 0 0

DNA can be taken from a few strands of hair, not just mouth swabs. No, it wouldnt be abuse. Law provides that "Reasonable force" or "no force than absolutely necessary" would be used to take the sample if the subject wasnt co-operating.

2007-05-28 22:40:29 · answer #5 · answered by dagaffman 2 · 1 0

Yes, they would get a court order that would allow them to use any necessary force to take the sample from you. In point of fact, if you were unwilling, they would be likely to get an order allowing them to take blood, which is likely to hurt a little bit more than the cheek swab!

2007-05-29 04:05:30 · answer #6 · answered by pob14 4 · 0 0

DEFINITIVE ANSWER!!! yes they can force you,a nd ill explain why.

yes under the police and criminal evidence act 1984, the police by law are required to take DNA sample from everyperson who is arrested.

It is normally only taken the first two times your arrested to make sure that they have an accurate sample.

The police will first ask you to voluntarily take a mouthswab.

If you refuse then a Force Medical Examiner will actually pull your hair out at the root.

Under this piece of legislation the police can forcibly hold you down and restrain you with cuffs and leg restraints for this to be done.

and the reason it's not abuse, is that it is provided for by law.

A police officer is allowed to lay hands on you and technically assault you as long as his actions are justified and provised for under law.

the same for fingerprints, we can hold people down and take them forcibly

2007-05-29 03:44:26 · answer #7 · answered by the mofo 4 · 3 0

The police have the powers to obtain a DNA sample following arrest. If you were to refuse then one would be obtained using reasonable force. Hair follicles would suffice in this instance.

2007-05-29 11:12:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Recordable crimes give power to the police to take your finger prints, photos and dna.. By force if required.

Basically you will be held down or restrained and a sample will be taken..

2007-05-29 02:33:20 · answer #9 · answered by dcukldon 3 · 0 0

Touched? Like grabbed on the arm to get put back into your cell? No this isnt abuse. Im sure they could arrange for a gay prisoner to show you what abuse is.

They have to have your consent as far as Im aware, to take and keep any of your DNA. Unless they got a court order, you dont have to agree.

2007-05-28 21:44:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers