Let me preface this by saying that I do not intend this as a generalization for all theists, only those who lash out against non-believers, and complain about their beliefs not having influence in government.
Non-theists:
Started this country (America), on a foundation of freedom and a religiously neutral government.
Discovered electricity. (Ben Franklin) Harnessed electricity. (Thomas Edison)
Developed countless medical and technological advances, making them largely responsible for your every modern convenience, and the fact that you can live to be older than 40.
Yet you demand that the government and its laws should reflect YOUR beliefs and opinions, over anyone else’s. That your God belongs on the country’s money, and in the country’s pledge. (cont'd...)
2007-05-28
20:48:39
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Master Maverick
6
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
You’re more than willing to flip a switch upon entering a room for instant light, rather than praying for light, which by your logic, would be more appropriate. (And let me point out, much less effective) You demand that schools teach creationism, and are enraged by the teaching of evolution, despite the fact that evolution has real applications in medicine, and creationism has no application outside personal belief. What has your oh-so-perfect belief system contributed to the advancement of mankind? How do you justify taking full advantage of non-theist contributions while insisting that your beliefs should be imposed on the nation as a whole, a nation which those beliefs have done nothing to create or improve? How do you use everything non-theist people and policies have provided, and continue to insist that they are wrong?
2007-05-28
20:48:49 ·
update #1
To the second and third answerers: You assert that God created everything, yet this assertion lacks any evidence, and invariably fails to yield any manner of results aside from personal satisfaction.
Dead Prez – I’m quite calm. How is it you feel you can judge my mood simply by reading the above?
In addition, this country was established (in 1776, when we asserted our independence, and declared ourselves a soverign nation, rather than a territory of Britain) on freedom, not religion. Not Chirtsianity. My assertions above are quite accurate. If we are to assume that this is a Christian-founded country, we must also deny our independence.
2007-05-28
21:06:04 ·
update #2
shaolt2002: I fail to see how that affects the substance of my question? Maybe not technically a non-theist, but as religiously neutral as was the focus of the point I made.
2007-05-28
21:24:17 ·
update #3
Dakota - No prob, man. And thank you for not being in the group I mentioned in this question. I've got no beef with anyone, theist or not, who refrains from pushing their religion on others. It's also rare that you can ask a question like this, and not get a ton of posts saying "UR an idiot! I am right!"
2007-05-28
21:58:23 ·
update #4