I heard that Oregon allows this.
I can imagine that religious viewpoints will heavily way upon a person's opinion of this. My opinion: bring on the pills. I don't see any good reason that a dying person shouldn't be able to choose precisely when and how they go if they are going to go anyway.
2007-05-28
20:10:06
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Jadochop
6
in
Health
➔ Diseases & Conditions
➔ Other - Diseases
I realize that we are all going to go eventually, but this is referring to people who are short timers in complete agony, and that want to die at their convenience.
2007-05-28
20:11:45 ·
update #1
Absolutely! Especially when the pills are being paid for by the taxpayers dollars! You see, society wants old people to enjoy the last few breaths of life, yet they also want the old people to be nice and buzzed when they finally go. So painless, life ending pills are the perfect way to go. Hoorah for those wonderful, magical pills!
2007-05-28 20:29:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is called euthanasia, For generations the moral and ethics of it has been discussed.
I believe it is dangerous for humans to start making decisions of who does and when. That needs to be left to the hand of God and to nature. There are people who weren't meant to live and lived. It would be too risky to take a life when it might of done well for more years.
Actually in the medical commuity it is kown that dying patients are often get a little push into eternity by the pain medication they use for the patients pain.It is just a risk of high dosages of medicaton to keep the person comfortable.
We arn't talking taking a life here. Just medicated to keep a dying person as comfortable as they can.
I think it more honorable to keep a person dying from being as pain free as possible.
It is way too controlling for a person to choose their time of death. This opend the doors for all sorts of human decisions that could turn the earth into a place where life death and other things are artifically controlled.
2007-05-28 20:32:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by clcalifornia 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't disagree with life ending pills, but I think that it needs to be considered that there are people who WOULD survive and make it through illnesses who might request the pills. From a non-religious view point (being non-religious) I can see the beauty in waiting for miracles to happen - because we're all kidding ourselves if we think miracles don't happen from time to time, in fact most of us know of one.
However if it were my loved one and they wanted the pills I don't think I could watch them in pain for the sake of waiting for a miracle...
So I pretty much didn't answer the question at all did I... :P
2007-05-28 20:20:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by miss.t 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, this should be available to everyone who is terminal and should be part of your advanced directive! Why is it that humans are allowed to suffer agonies and indignities at the end and we are more humane to our animals!?! We put Rufus and Fluffy to "sleep" because they are suffering but everyone raises such a flap over it in human form!?! Definitely should be a decision you make when you are younger and healthier and one you should rethink if and when you are given the news of terminal illness. I would have it put in my advance directive, living will, what ever you want to call it, if it were offered!
2007-05-28 20:39:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by phxmilitarymom 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
that question is a bouquet of thorns, but in my opinion, if some one is going to be a vegetable or is on his last days, weeks?. why Dennie them the right to go in dignity and peace, as for my self i have what we call a living will. and there is a standing order that they are to NOT keep my body alive and let it whitter away if i am 1) in a terminal coma or 2) going to be a vegetable. i have lived with Honor and dignity i wish to leave the same way and if some one objects let them take my place
2007-05-28 20:23:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by one_crazy_medic 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Very exciting question. My grandfather exceeded directly to the finished beyond by using Alzheimer's this previous August. The final 3 wks. of his life he replaced into unresponsive, had a low coronary heart value, and replaced right into slightly impressive on. It replaced into relatively painful for my family contributors and that i considering that he lived with us, all we could do replaced into watch and wait. It appeared agonizing by using fact at circumstances it appeared like he had to talk yet could no longer. One evening i replaced into in his room and rapidly he awakened and started speaking. yet his strategies replaced into interior the 1970's. He reported how he had a job and had little toddlers to shelter (he replaced into in his 80's and retired 2 a protracted time in the past and all his toddlers have been grown) he did no longer comprehend i replaced into his granddaughter, he basically concept i replaced into his co-worker. He talked and talked and we laughed together. even although he did no longer comprehend me, i replaced into the final person he ever talked to. 3 days later he exceeded directly to the finished beyond. i does no longer commerce that 2nd for something. You by no potential comprehend what form of miracles might take place even while the situation seems glum. Sorry it is so long...yet basically, no i do no longer think of they must end their lives while they want to. via the way - there are innovations to a scientific institution while the affected person is terminally sick. that's reported as hospice care. they help to convenience the affected person for the period of their final days, no longer postpone demise, hospitals tend to try this. that's extra non violent, and that they do no longer poke and prod the affected person. yet they provide soreness drugs and such to help keep the affected person comfortable.
2016-11-23 13:29:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋