If he did, that would be great, but that hasn't happened in a while, so I either go for "the next best thing" or I just stay at home.
I vote FOR candidates, and base it on the issues. I don't believe in that notion of voting against other candidates. So if I can't vote FOR anyone, I don't vote at all.
2007-05-28 16:49:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Veritas 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
No - and I'm not sure he does.
I will say that when Bill (I call him "Slick Willie") was electyed I was disappointed, then he turned out better than I expected. Evern entertaining to a degree.
When W was elected I had great expectations - followed by greater disappointment. I wish he had dumped Cheney in 2004 - that would have been a good move. W needs good handlers but he has surrounded huimself with the wrong people. Also needs to learn how to say "nuclear" (it's not nucular, George).
Would I vote for Mitt romney? Not sure - but that;s not because he's Mormon, it's because his convictions seem too malleable.
2007-05-28 16:53:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Richard of Fort Bend 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Anyone who elects a president based off of his "religious" beliefs should not be allowed to vote. Religion is something politicians wear on there sleeve. Sad really
2007-05-29 03:25:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by abstract_alao 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
A president is better not to share his religious beliefs; look what happens..-_- Religion should be seperate from state and country because so many people have differing veiws. It should be respected, whatever their choice is, however, but not brought in in the decisions of the pres.
2007-05-28 16:52:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, I elect a president who I think would be right to lead America, not for religious belief.
2007-05-28 16:49:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
No, but it is a plus. We had Jimmy Carter who is a Southern Baptist and I think he was one of our worst Presidents. (I happen to belong to a Southern Baptist church) Then, there was that man that shamed the very office before the whole world, Bill Clinton. No, anyone can say they're a Christan, or Baptist, or whatever, but talk is cheap isn't it?
I voted for both of the Bush guys, because they were conservative, but very firm and stand up guys. We agree on most of the issues.....the main thing that gets my vote. They are credible and upstanding in their public life and there's past history of dishonorable episodes.
Of course my religious beliefs do enter in because the way I stand on the issues directly correlates to my beliefs.
2007-05-28 17:02:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Joyful Noise 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
i don't comprehend what Glenn Beck you have been listening to, however the single on FOX never stated this variety of element. I doubt you even comprehend what a theocracy is... one among those government wherein a god, deity, or possibly a human seemed to be a god is known with the aid of fact the state's ultimate civil ruler. it fairly is somewhat what the form became into attempting to stay away from. And Beck has stated as plenty on many events.
2016-10-30 01:11:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why would I care about what he believes religiously, when there is supposed to be separation of religion and state? Since I am not religious, I suppose it would be okay because he wouldn't be mixing the two. This is really the only president who has used his religious beliefs to interfere with his job.
2007-05-28 16:50:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by AuroraDawn 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
There has not been a Presidential candidate in ages who shares my religious beliefs. I tend to give far more credence to their political record than to what they claim to believe in terms of religion.
2007-05-28 16:56:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by solarius 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No I vote for the person who I think will do the better job and how they stand on the issues. Their religion or lack there of plays no part in how I vote. Iam a Catholic Christian
2007-05-28 16:50:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by tebone0315 7
·
2⤊
0⤋