Is a picture of a naked woman, alone, doing nothing sexual considered pornography?
2007-05-28 12:34:15 · 8 answers · asked by DALIAN 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
It would depend on the context. There are many medical books and pregnancy books that show woman naked and they certainly aren't pornographic. I think there needs to be a sexual element to it
2007-05-28 12:53:44 · answer #1 · answered by joeanonymous 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I consider it to be both art AND pornography. For a picture to be pornographic, it has to suggest something lustful or unholy. But, a painting of a woman posing naked upon a draped bed, for example, would be considered art (though nothing I'd want to show to my kids.
2007-05-28 20:28:10 · answer #2 · answered by Sharon Newman (YR) Must Die 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No Definitely Not!!!!! A woman body is the temple of the Holy Spirit and life comes from her so if people think that the naked body of woman is pornography then they are really not a human being are they?
2007-05-28 19:50:24 · answer #3 · answered by karen kremer smith 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Pornography is in the eyes of the beholder. A lot has to do with the photo's context.
2007-05-28 19:48:36 · answer #4 · answered by Equinoxical ™ 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
To the moral majority it is pornographic. I wouldn't want you to show that to a small child, but I personally don't believe it to be pornographic.
2007-05-28 19:53:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm in agreement with the above answers. For something to be pornography it has to be intended to provoke lust.
2007-05-28 19:55:25 · answer #6 · answered by wenchiepirategirl 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Perhaps in some cultures, but mostly not.
2007-05-29 16:39:05 · answer #7 · answered by nudie chick 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
or art if you look at it that way
2007-05-28 20:23:50 · answer #8 · answered by Steven C 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋