The Fujifilm F-series always seem to do very well in low light situations.
Check out this comparison page. Click on "In-depth review" and "Read Owner Opinions" for each camera. Be sure to note that the reviews are many pages long so you don't stop after page one. Check the sample images, also. You can enlarge these to full size images if you click on the file name shown below the picture. You will have to then put your cursor in the white space to the right of the picture and click once. After that, you can pass your cursor over the image and it will turn into a magnifier. Click it as a magnifier once and the image will go to full size and you can really examine the detail or look for artifacts like purple fringing around items in high contrast photos or noise in darker areas of the picture.
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/compare_post.asp?method=sidebyside&cameras=fuji_finepixf30%2Cfuji_finepixf31fd%2Cfuji_finepixf40fd&show=all
2007-05-28 10:57:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Picture Taker 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Dr Sam is right as rain. I am going to use the "S" word, and say it's time for a digital SLR. Realistically, no compact or even pro-sumer digicam will give you the performance and image quality, especially at higher ISO, of a dSLR. The entry level dSLRs are getting more affordable. Olympus has a pretty nice kit with two lenses for $599 USD, and the Canon & Nikon offerings with the kit lenses are not too far from that price.
Good luck.
2007-05-28 11:34:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ara57 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I agree with the second poster who said the Fujifilm F series. This is a case where brand matters. I have the F10, which I've been happy with but it's been discontinued. If it ever dies, I'll get the F30 because it goes up to 3200 ISO. The way I see it, if it takes tolerable pictures at 3200 ISO, it must take really good pictures at 800 ISO. I'm not sure what manual controls you want though. You'll have to shop around to get the F30 for less than $300 though.
2007-05-28 11:34:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
if you can spare the extra $7 dollars, i recommend the Nikon Coolpix L11 i see it on sale for as low as $107 from several online shops (see link below) - it's brand new, not a refurb. Here are the Pros: + Nikon quality + Nikon 3x lens + 6mp - enough for just about any use + low light capabilities + face sensing auto focus technology + red eye reduction + on camera editing + movie recording with sound + direct to printer connection + big enough 2.4 in LCD + SD card the cons (well you gotta give up something) + its kind of big + uses regular AA batteries, doesn't come with rechargeable battery. but you can get some rechargeable AA's to use. + doesn't have some of the newer features out there like anti-shake let us know how it goes! -fb
2016-04-01 01:29:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Karen 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
From My experience....yes...At this very minute I am having problems with my digital camera. I used to wonder why some cameras cost more than others..now I know. Quality is more important than price. I have went through several low-priced cameras, to discover than they all work the same. I'm gonna throw in the towel and purchase one that is atleast $300. My advice to you is to do the same. Several of my friends have Kodaks, and are very happy with them.
2007-05-28 10:58:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Boo Bee 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
my suggestion
go to yahoo shopping
digital cameras
digital camera GUIDE
be sure to check titles on the left side
the guide should answer your questions
2007-05-28 11:14:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Elvis 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
D - S - L - R (sung to the tune of "Gloria) ;-)
2007-05-29 18:41:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by V2K1 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes most of the camers do that what you said
2007-05-28 10:56:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by caitlin f 2
·
1⤊
1⤋