There is a whole museum dedicated to creation! How can it not be true?!
*Hehe
2007-05-28 03:37:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by KS 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Creation is beyond science, and so there is not direct evidence.
But there is evidence from the Flood.
Before that, there was a ice shield over our atmosphere as told in Genesis "...and God separated the water above from the water beneath...". This cause us to have about twice the air pressure and oxygen levels that we have today (these air samples are taken from amber). Also the ice water kept out harmful rays from the sun.
At the time of the flood, this ice shield collapsed and mostly collected around the earth's magnetic poles (ice at -300 F has a magnetic property) an not its axis poles. This ice covered and preserved many things, like palm trees in Antarctica and plum trees in norther Canada.
There are many other example that relate to the flood.
2007-05-28 10:42:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by tim 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Have you ever read "The Case for a Creator" by Lee Strobel? It only scratches the surface of it, and doesn't answer all the questions, but it is a good start. There's loads of evidence that the Earth, the universe, and life itself had a creator.
As for Genesis, I think that "dirt" is actually supposed to be taken to mean "matter." That's my theory, I might be wrong. People of that time certainly would NOT have understood matter, atoms, protons, neutrons, electrons, or quarks.
And speaking of quarks, do you know what they are? SOUND. Everything in the universe, excluding the entity known as "anti-matter", is composed of matter, which is composed of atoms. Once you break down atoms, they are composed of protons, neutrons, and electrons. Those are composed of quarks. God "spoke" everything into being, according to Genesis. Wouldn't it make sense, then, that we're composed of sound?
2007-05-28 10:44:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Well, it's not really that there are a lot of hard facts behind creation. It's more like there are gaping holes in the theory of evolution. How do you say eukaryotic cells first formed? The little prokaryotic cells magically joined together in just the perfect way for all of them to function together. How are humans related to other primates? Well... y-y-you see... there's this..this missing link! Ya, a missing link. He just explains explains everything.
2007-05-28 10:48:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
This is both a strawman (since Christians don't claim that they can prove that God created man) and a tu quoque fallacy (accusing Christians of lacking evidence for creationism doesn't strengthen the evidence for macroevolution).
2007-05-29 00:06:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Deof Movestofca 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
There are NO facts behind creation. Creation is a myth to make people feel special and to make people worship God/Creator.
Crocs and other animals don't evolve because they don't have to, they are the perfect animal for their habitat and climate. If either change, the crocs would evolve or become exstinct.
People and Earth are comprised of the same elements because life started from the elements on Earth. Nothing made dirt into man.
2007-05-28 10:46:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mega 3
·
0⤊
4⤋
Just check out the chemical make up of a human .It is the same as the earth.
How come animals that are millions of years old like crocs,alligators celiocampths not evolving at all?
2007-05-28 10:38:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by AngelsFan 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
One fact behind creation is that all life reproduces after its kind. Gen. 1:21, 24, 25: "And God proceeded to create the great sea monsters and every living soul that moves about, which the waters swarmed forth according to their kinds, and every winged flying creature according to its kind. And God went on to say: “Let the earth put forth living souls according to their kinds, domestic animal and moving animal and wild beast of the earth according to its kind.” And it came to be so. And God proceeded to make the wild beast of the earth according to its kind and the domestic animal according to its kind and every moving animal of the ground according to its kind."
2007-05-28 10:36:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by LineDancer 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
I'm waiting for humans to evolve wings to fly to work. According to evolution, humans should fly before pigs.
2007-05-28 10:37:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by WhyNotAskDonnieandMarie 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
Evolution is an indisputable fact but it's always interesting to read the creationist rhetoric and wordplay as they try and disparage it. I think they've just admitted defeat and stopped trying to find valid arguments to challenge it.
2007-05-28 10:41:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋