Well, as you can clearly see in your own question faith in God does not opose logic. I'm a christian and a Biologist (i just graduated so i think its still too soon for me to consider myself a christian scientist), still my work is now in research.
Science dosen't have the power to deny or to prove God. I know that many Physicist do turn to God to explain how perfectly the laws of physics fit, still that dosen't prove that God exist the same way the evolution theory dosen't deny his existence. Its just something they accept, for me everithing we see has to be a result of an act of a loving God, and that is asd crazy and as scientificly inacurate as sayng it all happened and is happening by chance
Personaly i think atheism is ilogical. It bases itself on science and science (as i said) dosent have this ability They explain the whole universe and life as a mere casuality and i don't buy it, They claimed to be backed by logic and still more often than not simply choose to ignore logical arguments. But thats my personal opinion, also it only aplies to the "angry atheist people", the ones that are moved by emotional factors and felling agaisnt religion rather than logic.
2007-05-28 02:38:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Emiliano M. 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Be aware that many scientists use "God" to refer to the mysterious workings of the universe. Most scientists and scientist-theologians are thinking of God in pantheistic or panentheistic terms: Albert Einstein, Paul Davies, Arthur Peacocke, and Ian Barbour are all examples in this category, if I'm not mistaken.
Scientists are using the language of God entirely appropriately in these instances: not claiming to know without evidence or logic, but acknowledging transcendence and mystery in awesome wonder.
2007-05-28 02:25:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by jamesfrankmcgrath 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
you've some very exciting questions the following. would i attempt to reply to them? a million. god created human mind so human might want to clear out the rights and wrongs, the real difficulty and the fakes. 2. the water-turning-into-wine become done contained in the time at the same time as jesus become nevertheless on earth. does human already have the information of tricking that on the instantaneous? 3. that's amazingly complicated to prepare the miracles in the present day, it truly is why the non secular ones says both you've faith and develop right into a believer, or you're not to any extent further. yet all of us have our own percentage of mirwcles popular, are we no longer? we breath each and every few seconds, our heart beats, shall we listen, see, contact, flavor and scent. even each and every of the technology contained in the international couldn't discern out some randomize chemical reaction that would want to do this and positioned all of them in a unmarried being. 4. no, devil does no longer do evil, people do. devil tells us to do evil, and God tells us to do sturdy, and purely someone might want to opt for what he's prepared to do. 5. god created loose will in human as a tribulation for us, what would our ideas in life be? the danger free, sturdy those who're damage by utilising evil people is what occurred at the same time as people opt for his or her selection, to do undesirable issues. 6. god provides us the optimal intelligence than different earth being so we will be in the route of Him. the scientists international huge chanced on new issues and theories on on a daily basis foundation. does a lot of those information would brings us in the route of God or faraway from, this is as a lot as us people to settle on. God intends us to questions each and everything and attempt to search for solutions, no longer basically follows Him blindly.
2016-10-18 10:53:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Atheists will dispute that with you, but in defense I will quote you some lines I heard in Star Trek 4 last night:
Spock: We must save Checov
Kirk: Is that the logical thing to do?
Spock: No, it is the human thing to do!
That's the problem with logic, it's inhuman sometimes.
It's General Ripper in Dr. Strangelove
"I'm not saying we won't get our hair mussed, but 20 million tops!"
That's how logic thinks. 20 million random people have to die for a logical decision.
The human thing to do when someone is sending 100 A-bomb missles at you is to not do anything, but THAT is illogical.
I'm talking on an ultimate level.
The REACTIONARY thing to do is strike back with everything you got.
Einstein once say: Science without religion is lame and religion without science is blind.
That's perhaps the best explaination.
2007-05-28 02:30:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Dig deep enough into the Nature of the universe, you find something divine. You may not know how to describe it, but it's there. It is not randomness, but consciousness. The quantum physicist will tell you that all physical matter is mere potential until worked upon by consciousness. It's nearly impossible to explain except in metaphor and symbol, but it is there.
2007-05-28 02:28:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by auntb93 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
The real fact is that "many" scientist have NOT turned to religion. You are just repeating a falsehood spread by phonies trying to convince everyone of a incorrect statement. David Foster is not a scientist, he does not use the scientific method to demonstrate his position. He just makes statements that he makes up, says they are true, and the uneducated and gullible masses buy it.
2007-05-28 02:28:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
Because God himself is the ultimate scientist!
2007-05-28 02:25:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm sorry...............I think you need to read a few science journals rather than "christian science" journals. While I'm aware many scientists have faith of some kind, I think you'll find the representation of atheists in the scientific community is stronger than ever before.
Or are you including people who call themselves scientists, with no valid credentials, just so they can trash evolution and other aspects of reality?
2007-05-28 02:27:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Er, that would be psuedo scientists buddy..!!
Don't confuse creationist nonsense with mainstream science.
The scientific community doesn't take kindly to religious fruitcakes with an agenda claiming to be "real" scientists..
You'd better choose between how science has got it all wrong, or how science agrees with you. Either way you'd be wrong, but at least you won't be contradicting yourselves..
Don't choke on all that denial and ignorance coming out of your mouth..
2007-05-28 02:35:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Has it ever occurred to you that through the scientific method that the logical answer is that there is a God?
2007-05-28 02:28:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by james e 2
·
2⤊
0⤋