Let's have some fun! Let's make a tentative assumption in order to draw out & test the logical or EMPIRICAL consequences of a situation concerning both global warming & Tesla technology. Let's imagine that your belief was that global warming is a myth, but the government's claim is that it is REAL and DIRE. Now, imagine that you believe Tesla technology is used by the government to control the weather, but their claim DENIES such intelligence. Now, a CATASTROPHIC natural disaster occurs. What thoughts come to your mind when giving this whole scenario deep thought? What would you make of such a disaster? Would you blame mother nature? Would you blame the government? Would you be at the very least suspicious of the government? What would you make of a catastrophic event given this hypotheses?
2007-05-28 02:11:25 · 8 answers · asked by Light Fly 4 in Environment ➔ Global Warming
What would be your REACTION to catastrophic events that wiped people and places off the map? How does this entire scenario make you feel? Personally, it scares the hell out of me! If a person DID believe in global warming, but knew NOTHING of Tesla technology, I suppose that when a catastrophic event occurred, they would just blame global warming whenever huge parts of the U.S. started falling into the sea and mass groups of people were swallowed up. They surely wouldn't be suspicious of their government as having anything to do with it, because most of the general public are unaware of Tesla technology and the history of how it was sold to the U.S. See, I get scared at the whole thought because, if evil men could wipe off parts of the earth with such technology, they could wipe off the parts for example, where they could first rob states of their monies, wipe them off the map, and all the while they would just blame it on global warming and no one would ever suspect a thing.
2007-05-28 02:12:07 · update #1
I know, I'm out there! Really, I'm just a deep thinker and I like to question things...EVERYTHING.
I believe the mind should remain expansive and open at all times, allowing room for it to 'breathe' as we think, so that it is prepared and ready at all times to be accepting of other truths and possibilities. I find it important to be ever observant of the things that are happening around us, as if we are blind reaching out to feel EVERYTHING so that SURELY we will know where we stand. I question everything, but yet I settle for nothing, if that makes sense. I know...it all sounds so philosophical! I guess my Uncle Joe, who IS a philosopher has rubbed off on me! hahahaha
2007-05-28 02:12:36 · update #2
To the one who claims he is no one, by your own admission, I will not go so low as to meet you there...you ARE someone...you ARE a voice, and you are obviously disturbed. Although you are blind and dying of thirst, and make claim to not notice the water or its depth, you sure knew where to come for your drink. Your heart heard something or else you wouldn't have stepped onto the shores! Make a wish now, because I am wishing you well by the waters in which I swim!
2007-05-28 04:10:37 · update #3
Wow! This is way too deep for me. However you might be interested to know that there are some people who believe we are already having some success altering weather patterns. See this site:
http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/
2007-05-28 02:20:00 · answer #1 · answered by STEVE C 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think the closest we have come to controlling the weather is from a process called "cloud seeding." This involves introducing silver iodide and dry ice into a moisture rich environment in the atmosphere. The supercooled particles make water condense onto the very fine silver iodide and produce water droplets. It's the same principle as water forming on the outside of your glass. It's why mom said to always use a coaster on her table!
As far as Tesla technology to control weather as a weapon, that is the stuff of conspiracy theorists and the such. I happen to work for the AFRL. We conduct experiments in the upper ionosphere. This experimentation deals with communications, not anthing else. An active imagination could be better served as a writer of science fiction novels. Please allow yourself to imagine that their isn't a conspiracy. That there are really good people who are devoting their lives and talents to helping mankind to flourish. Imagine for a minute that the "government" does not have a master plan to use forces of nature to strike down mankind.
2007-05-28 03:34:09 · answer #2 · answered by Target 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, first off, my cousin is a climotologist and human geographer in New Zealand and I had to interview him for a project from my school and I can atest to the fact that global warming is real. It isn't a myth and I know that.
And about the government, our president and his administration hides alot from us. I would not be the least suprised if Bush and his evil cronies had actually caused Katrina to happen, for example. But I do know that is impossible. Our government lost hundreds of billions of dollars that those greedy bastards woul never have seen let go no matter the circumstances.
You can't live in suspicsion of your, our, government though. We have by far the best government in the world.
2007-05-28 02:50:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dick and Jane think global warming is not true.
The Man tells Dick and Jane that global warming is true and is a real threat.
Dick and Jane (apparently under the influence of a controlled-substance) contrive a conspiracy theory in which The Man can control the weather/climate with an electromagnetic super-weapon.
Dick and Jane witness a weather/climate-related catastrophe.
Who would Dick and Jane blame for this catastrophe?
---probably their parents.
Deep?... This is not even shallow.
2007-05-28 03:25:37 · answer #4 · answered by Saint Christopher Walken 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
my first concern would be with the victims of the event. after Katrina, we'd all agree response would need to be better.
my second thought would be intense anger with the companies / government entities that allowed this to happen.
my third and lasting feelings would be those of frustration, because the liable parties would never be punished.
hope that's what you were asking...
2007-05-28 02:36:02 · answer #5 · answered by Empowerment 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The scenario needs a little more thought-Tesla was more into Energy-Transmission.
2007-05-28 04:57:07 · answer #6 · answered by Ard-Drui 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think as long as money can be made . thing will always be held from us Nikola Tesla is a good example
2007-05-28 03:42:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think Superman could beat Spider Man in a fight. Really.
2007-05-28 03:01:27 · answer #8 · answered by campbelp2002 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋