Fish were probably not the primary fertilizer. They rotated their crops to a new location which was prepared by burning the forest. If the soil began to wear out the crops were simply moved to a new location & the old site was abandoned and allowed to return to the wild.
2007-05-27 14:58:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Thornapple 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
They used fish.
2007-05-27 21:48:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by iamnoone 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Didn't you ever read the Pilgrim stories in school when you were a kid? They used dead fish
2007-05-27 21:53:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by † H20andspirit 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why pick on fishâ¥
2007-05-27 21:49:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Fish <>< 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
well i would imagine that without all the pulutants in the air and soil that the ground was so rich then that they didnt need fertalizers.
2007-05-27 21:46:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by bootleg 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
They didn't use fertilizers
2007-05-27 21:49:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Pamela V 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Fish and chips! ;0)
2007-05-27 21:45:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
They didn't need to. They didn't destroy the land the way agribusiness does now.
2007-05-27 21:46:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by WWTSD? 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
fish.
2007-05-27 21:47:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by Hannah's Grandpa 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
fish.
2007-05-27 21:46:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by DaSdEn 2
·
0⤊
1⤋