There's more death and perverted sex in that thing than in 8mm.
2007-05-27 11:27:32 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
So if a parent lets his or her child read the Bible, an R-rated movie is definitely no problem. Honestly.
2007-05-27 11:31:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately the bible is not for the feignt of heart or for Children. When passion of the Christ was made, people saw how violent the good parts are, imagine if Gibson had have delved into the OT for material. THere would have been a public outcry.
2007-05-27 11:32:29 · answer #2 · answered by ɹɐǝɟsuɐs Blessed Cheese Maker 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Try picking up a good news bible , it probably has the best interpretation for a child , However it really doesn't change any of the stories , but like any TV show or book with a mature rating , parents should be monitoring what their kids are doing and explain things they don't understand properly.
2007-05-27 11:33:36 · answer #3 · answered by Suicide642 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Upon extra theory, it grow to be my deduction that my question concerning Playgirl fairly probably wasn't perfect for viewing by the extra youthful human beings. additionally, however i'm no prude, my question grow to be slightly hypocritical in that i'm somebody who would not experience this is optimal to objectify adult men or women human beings. yet what i'm going to stand in the back of is the certainty that there fairly are discrepancies that exist between how women and adult men human beings are sexually exploited. and that i will declare that i think u.s. fairly is a sexually-repressed usa. And, i'm unsure that this may be a solid element. EDIT: in basic terms for clarification's sake, I did start up up the digital mail exchanges, and it fairly grow to be my own selection to delete the question. no person bullied me into it. Gnu has consistently taken care of me with appreciate, even whilst he's been dissatisfied in my point of view on particular issues. we don't disagree in many circumstances, yet as quickly as we do, i think of we the two tend to grant one yet another the honour to take heed to what the different has to declare. I never meant to offend anyone right here.
2016-10-08 23:07:03 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Victorian era Bibles sometimes bowdlerised the content to be more in line with contemporary mores.
2007-05-27 11:34:11 · answer #5 · answered by Doc Occam 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
bibles were almost removed from schools when evangelicals went after atheist or other books with language issues, adult content or slanderous names and violence
pretty dang embarrassing when your religion is based on bigotry and considered not fit for public schools, yet is the source of moral authority and has young women being raped, etc
2007-05-27 11:34:20 · answer #6 · answered by voice_of_reason 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Bible is not suitable for anyone, especially children. "ok, children, lets read about how the Jews killed everyone except the virgin girls, which they kept for raping"
2007-05-27 11:32:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Borders.
2007-05-27 11:34:56 · answer #8 · answered by Me 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe Disney makes one complete with a lovable camel that tells the story and a little angel that sings .
2007-05-27 11:32:46 · answer #9 · answered by Yaga 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
That's what Sunday School is for -- the instructors present cleaned up versions. Then you get older and learn the REAL stories (which are still fiction, but still they get mean).
I'm glad I survived those days.
2007-05-27 11:33:26 · answer #10 · answered by Resident Heretic 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋