2007-05-27 08:16:01 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
they snuck a program called EEVS into the bill, and that really is a scary one.
"The American Civil Liberties Union today expressed grave concerns about the due process and privacy implications of the Senate immigration bill. The proposed legislation would create a vast federal database to verify the work eligibility of all job applicants in America - including U.S. citizens; expand indefinite detention; and deny effective judicial review of Department of Homeland Security errors denying immigration status."
"As a part of EEVS, every person in America would be forced to carry a hardened Social Security card perhaps containing biometric information about the cardholder - essentially a national ID - and present a Real ID-compliant driver’s license to get any new job. The proposed legislation also expands current practice of expedited removal. The ACLU noted that these policies do nothing to solve the problems of illegal immigration and violate the fundamental American value of due process."
thats right. In order to be employed in the USA, you will have to be given a security clearance by the dept of Homeland Security.
2007-05-27 08:22:44 · answer #1 · answered by ExDopefiend 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yes, several times, via email. But it's useless. My senator is Dianne Fienstein and she's from SF, a Sanctuary City.
2007-05-27 15:32:17 · answer #2 · answered by suenami_98 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You know what. No I haven't. I've been bellyachin' about it for some time now...but get caught up in the misery of gas prices and my everyday life chaos so I am going to do that now! I think people get to busy and forget that they have voices that they can extend out to our government. "For the People by the People" right? Thanks for reminding us!
Your momma or daddy ever say " The squeaky wheel gets the oil?" Well its true!
2007-05-27 15:22:20 · answer #3 · answered by armywife 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, I let him know it is unfair...
$5,000 fine is not fair for poor people..
It should be lowered to about $2,000
Amnesty is to forgive a crime but the current bill is punishing instead..
2007-05-28 08:15:00 · answer #4 · answered by Redeemed 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Many times, I am looking for the police to show up at my house for harassment of a government official anytime.
2007-05-27 15:33:32 · answer #5 · answered by M B 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Oh yeah, but as I read the bill I keep coming up with more and more problems, and I just have to shoot off another little note...
2007-05-27 15:18:36 · answer #6 · answered by DAR 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
yes i have one i do not need to worry about she is on the side of no amensty the others are just a rubber stamp for Bush so those i had to send lots of thoughts to
2007-05-27 23:26:33 · answer #7 · answered by billc4u 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh a few times. And I didn't lack words. I told them it was pure BS. No amnesty, No reform.
2007-05-27 15:23:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
you can bet your sweet bippy I did!
2007-05-27 15:54:10 · answer #9 · answered by AliBaba 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, but i've given up on life.
2007-05-27 15:20:58 · answer #10 · answered by enigma 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋