In response to a previous question (first link), a few expressed this sentiment: "speed limits are a safety issue, marriage limits aren't."
But isn't that a matter of opinion? For example, between December 1995 to May 1999, Montana's daytime automobile speed limits were whatever was "reasonable and prudent." Even though I did not live in Montana, as a libertarian-leaning person, I really liked this law, and saw "reasonable and prudent" as, well, reasonable and prudent. I had hopes the concept would sweep the nation. But, alas, OTHERS SAW DANGER WHERE I DID NOT, and the law was changed to be more restrictive. Do those who support the legalization of same-sex marriage understand that OTHERS SEE DANGER WHERE THEY DO NOT?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Avzwt9JRYDoqQ8gsArrzAlnty6IX?qid=20070527005740AAc55Mf
http://www.us-highways.com/montana/mtspeed.htm
2007-05-26
23:13:05
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality