Yooooo hooooo athiests....miss me?

Question

Your logic fails. An example...

Although there is no evidence for the superstring theory, the many-worlds interpretation, the copenhagen interpretation, etc....it does not mean that I make it seem like all these theories are the samethings....you would never say "I don't believe in the superstring theory because I think the many-worlds interpretation is false" simply because it makes no type of sense at all. The many-worlds interpretation and the superstring theory are two completely different things so you can believe in one and not the other.

Also using the Zeus analogy is also flawed, its like me saying "I don't believe in the geocentric theory, an ancient theory in science and a theory now ridiculed that no one believes in (Zeus) so thats why I don't believe in the superstring theory, another theory in science" The two things have completely different attributes why are you making it seem like they're the same?

Kids, (especially the dolt Eri..is that the best u can do..lol)


And also your logic about evidence also fails since everyone knows that "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence". I guess the heliocentric theory was false until proven true? wtf?
AND Nothing you said addresses the substance of my argument...this is typical of atheists with blind atheistic faith...why read something that contradicts your faith-based belief system?

Also, most of you will say something is comparable because there is no evidence for both, then you say there is no comparison between the superstring theory and Zeus, but there is...because there is no evidence for either...

The rest of your stuff is just vain insults that have nothing to do with the substance of the argument

Answer 1

Are you expecting Atheists to respond scientifically? Because those that come here are not scientists, they don't think like scientists, and they don't practice science. They are wannabe's.

So maybe you are picking on the infants?

Answer 2

The nature of your point is not clear. For a theory to be interesting, it must pass two tests: there must be some sort of evidence to support it, and it must be testable against future evidence. String theory isn't there yet, but it is at least conceivable that some day it will be, and in the meantime theoretical physicists are trying to construct theories based on that theory (which is really only a framework, not an actual theory) which could be tested. Since no theory of god is either testable or supported by evidence, all such theories are useless. Not necessarily wrong, mind you -- just useless: no predictions can be obtained from such.

Answer 3

A theory of any type including whatever the heck your talking about is just that.....a theory. It is not cold hard fact, it is not proven and it is not without flaws. The same as any religion, and I mean ANY religion.
Theorys explain POSSIBLE or partial explanations. Everytime someone answers a question, two more take its place until all answers are given to all questions asked.
As for the Zeus analogy.......how do you know that NO ONE believes the theory anymore? There might be someone who is a die hard who believes in the old ways.
Remember.....The only absolute in the universe is ones lack of total knowledge.

Answer 4

String theory has nothing to do with atheism. In no way is string theory needed for atheism to be correct. Your theories are redicoulous and you are only trying to gain an edge by bashing other theories and still not proving your own. There is evidence that the earth is at least 3.9 billion years old. There is evidence that creatures evolve over time. There is no evidence for god at all. You know about it through a book written 5000 years ago by man. Seriously what real fruit do you bring to the debate.

Answer 5

Who are you?

No, there's math to back up superstring theory. And we can test it in the next few years and see if it works out.

Not really sure where you're pulling the Zeus thing from. I can't see your point.

Dolt? I have a masters in physics. Do you? I really doubt it.

Answer 6

I think you have the Zeus theory thing wrong. We don't believe in god of, say, the bible for the same reason that you don't believe in Zeus. Believing in Zeus makes no sense (so most of us believe) just like believing in the bible god makes no sense to a few of us.

Seems like pretty good logic to me.

Answer 7

Hehheee just like there isn't any actual evidice or proof for the 'biblical jesus', but ya aren't going to get killed by an atheist for not believing their theory. One only need look at history for the christian 'convert or die' canto.

Answer 8

For your information they have connected string theory to modern physics. It was recently and I think you could find it if you use your search engine. You are clueless. Your god is going to go out just like Zues and his friends did when we figured out how things really worked.

Answer 9

Your question: I don't know you.

The rest of it: I haven't seen that many non sequiturs since I went looking for a Danae quote about debating on newsgroups.

Answer 10

It seems to me that you are a legend in your own mind. What does Zeus have to do with your question. Your statement illustrates your ignorance around atheism. I don't believe I have ever seen your presence before, however it seems you need to acquaint yourself with facts as they relate to your statements. OK?

Answer 11

And what is your argument?? I have the sense that if you would express it more coherently it would be interesting to respond to, but your rant is like of a moving target.