English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I think that it is wrong, there is no evidence to prove it.
There is evidence against it! Dinosaur fossils are found in rock layers created millions of years before the first people were discovered. If both existed at the same time, and people were prayed on by dinosaurs, there would at least be a LITTLE evidence to say so.

What do you think about it?

2007-05-26 12:32:59 · 16 answers · asked by Firefly 5 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

celi - I have read the bible.

friendshipband@sbcglobal.net - Those footprints were proven to be frauds. They were just worn away marks in the stone with the dinosaur footprints. No, I haven't been brainwashed!

Kyla - Humans didn't evolve from apes. They have a COMMON ANCESTOR. Would you seriously take a religious script as evidence against anything? And the skull thing - you can't do that, the bones are differently shaped.

2007-05-26 13:00:10 · update #1

Joan Lee - in retrospect, I should have used ''formed''.

2007-05-26 14:07:40 · update #2

16 answers

I agree with you. Everyone keeps saying "oh, come on, let people express themselves" -- and I agree that people should be allowed to express their beliefs. But the issue here is that kids are going to be visiting this museum and come away with the impression that scientists actually think man and dinosaurs co-existed -- and that's absolutely false.

The museum is deliberately misleading. They're deliberately not going to mention that Intelligent Design doesn't hold up to the scientific method. They're deliberately not going to mention that 99.9% of biologists support evolution. They're deliberately not going to mention that no decent scientist agrees with ANYTHING they're saying. And when you've got kids visiting your museum -- kids who are too young to know the difference -- THAT is when it's particularly wrong.

2007-05-26 12:41:06 · answer #1 · answered by . 7 · 6 0

They may as well have called it the "Intelligent Design Museum." Surely there's nobody out there that actually believes the stuff their exhibiting to be factual.

This is nothing more than an attempt to lend validation to a theory we all know is false. People are going to to get rich off of the curiosity, and ignorance of others.

Is anybody really surprised that it's in Kentucky? Smack in the middle of the Bible belt. That was brilliant. This museum would never fly in a city like Chicago, or San Francisco or Atlanta, or Seattle, or any other big city like that.

2007-05-26 19:40:50 · answer #2 · answered by Adam G 6 · 0 0

The Science can't prove the non-existence of God (they can't get to know our own solar system, would they know the whole universe?), but they take it for granted. Atheists got a quasi religious way of thinking. They want everybody to believe that there is no sign of intelligent design in the Universe and attributes to a fortuitous event the existence of the Universe.

Note: fortuitous event=happening by chance but also event which cause is unknown. So, they don't know what causes the Universe, so they can't say there in no God.

You said, "Dinosaur fossils are found in rock layers created millions of years before..." Is not 'created' equal to there is a creator that creates? Is it just curious to me. : )

2007-05-26 20:15:26 · answer #3 · answered by Joan Lee 2 · 1 0

Dr Carl Baugh has a similar museum and has fossils with dinosaur and human with sandal together

2007-05-26 19:46:47 · answer #4 · answered by sego lily 7 · 0 0

"Creationist musem" is like saying "creation science"; both are oxymorons.
Creationists have NO evidence whatsoever for their claims and in fact, every single time they do bring something forward (like the laughable paluxy prints) they are shown to be frauds and fakes almost immediately after actual scientific examination.
Which is why most of these charlatans won't allow their "finds" to be examined by real scientists. They hate the fact that someone with an actual education can spot one of their fabricated lies from a mile away.

2007-05-26 19:35:22 · answer #5 · answered by Yoda Green 5 · 6 1

there is plenty of evidence to prove it....and what makes you think that evolution evidence is viable and truthful either? There have been accounts of dinosaur bones being found with the DNA still in them, how could the DNA still be there if dinosaurs were supposed to have died off millions of years ago, don't you think the DNA would've been destroyed by now? Evolutionists say that man evolved from the ape, and showing the skull is supposed to prove anything, it's very easy to take a gorilla jaw bone and attach it to a human skull and say "voila, i've discovered early humans and it looks like they evolved from monkeys" evolution is a put together lie that will never be proven right and will continue to go in circles until Christ once again comes and proves it wrong, then it will die in the face of every human on earth....for every one piece of "evidence" you show of evolution, creationists can disprove it with five facts either from the bible or from scientific proof....

2007-05-26 19:45:57 · answer #6 · answered by ~*.:Kyla:.*~ 3 · 0 5

I'm terrified. If they are creating false museums like this one, what's to stop them from building others that follow "absolute Biblical rule"?

Stoning "harlots."
Forcing girls to marry their rapists.
Having slaves and "using" them when wives are not "fruitful."
I could go on but I'm afraid someone might show up and give me the "thou shalt not suffer a witch to live" crap.

2007-05-26 19:50:09 · answer #7 · answered by Voodoid 7 · 2 0

In Glen Rose Texas they did find the footprints of man and dinosaurs together. There is more evidence for early creation than what you can personally assimilate. You just have to start believing the bible, but you have been brainwash to believe that the bible is not accurate. Try starting here first.
http://www.carm.org/doctrine/100truths.htm

2007-05-26 19:44:34 · answer #8 · answered by rapturefuture 7 · 0 4

What is wrong about people wanting to prove there is a God through science? I am not saying that the other theory is completely wrong, but what is the point in proveing there is no God or that he didn't create us? I think it is sad how todays society is trying to push God away, and that some scientist seem to think they know all the answers, yet those answers keep changing.

2007-05-26 19:39:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

I have a problem with it being called a museum. I have no problem with it existing, but just it being considered a museum

2007-05-26 20:21:48 · answer #10 · answered by Southpaw 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers