Is reproduction no longer an evoloutionary process?
2007-05-26 11:50:38 · 7 answers · asked by james h 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Medicine
You're comparing apples and oranges. Evolution changes a species for the better, for the adapation to their surroundings.
Procreation has always been a mainstay of the human species.
Try a different argument.
2007-05-26 11:58:51 · answer #1 · answered by It's Kippah, Kippah the dawg 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evolution is the changing of a species. Reproduction is the recreating of the species.
2007-05-26 18:56:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
evolution is the result of many generations. every time a baby is born, that child is genetically different from every other. in nature, if these differences worked to the child's advantage, then they would most likely be passed down to the next generation. if not, then that's where the chain would end. but in modern society, changes are being created where naturally they wouldn't exist, because of how sheltered we are.
2007-05-26 18:55:51 · answer #3 · answered by Kitsune Kage 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because MAMMA doesnt want to give birth to an aneoba
2007-05-26 18:54:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your very question is faulty. And where did you get 14.7 billion years from?
2007-05-26 19:00:08 · answer #5 · answered by Lady Geologist 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mama used to bear something a lot different 14billion years ago than she does now.
2007-05-26 19:01:37 · answer #6 · answered by Dragon'sFire 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your question makes no sense. Even when stretched, it's false.
2007-05-26 18:54:53 · answer #7 · answered by ryoma136 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋