English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

some say the third antichrist is current US president George Bush. but why third? was there a 1st and 2nd? if yes, who were they??

2007-05-26 04:01:39 · 12 answers · asked by Lonez 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

12 answers

There hasn't been 1 antichrist yet. He will be preceded by the false prophet declaring his return. Everyone will love the antichrist and his ideas of peace. The book of revelations gives some really good insight to all this.

2007-05-26 04:07:30 · answer #1 · answered by comer59 3 · 2 0

actually, in the Book of Revelations, John talks about 7 Antichrists.

all seven were Roman Emperors(six before John and the seventh as John was writing revelations).

But the next couple verses begin to unveil something different. John talks about an "eighth" Antichrist that is soon to come. This Antichrist is the one that is still yet to come, the leader of the world and the New world order.

President Bush is not an antichrist. The real Antichrist will be Jewish, born and raised in Israel. He will rebuild the Temple of Jerusalem and win over the Jewish nation, but he will set up a throne in the temple and call himself God. this is what will cause the Jews to reject him.

2007-05-26 04:38:03 · answer #2 · answered by sanctusreal77 3 · 3 0

There are all kinds of people who don't know anything say about the person that is supposed to be called "The Antichrist". What those people don't know is what the bible says about that person.

He cannot be any American president. They aren't born in the right part of the world, and the Bible is clear that he will be born in the same area of the largest as the largest portion of Alexander the Greats old empire.

But the predictions are many and people can think that there is more than one Antichrist, but know that they are only telling on themselves. They are saying that they don't know.

One thing to recognize the Antichrist as being is 'well liked'. He is not going to be someone that the world hates.

2007-05-26 04:12:08 · answer #3 · answered by Christian Sinner 7 · 2 0

Whilst I was sipping coffee this morning at Starbucks, who would walk in but Antichrist I and Antichrist II. Their antique store is just around the corner, you see. Well, boy howdy, they are really ticked off with Antichrist III, George Wallace Bush. He is stealing all their thunder and they just might sue him, that is, if their adopted daughter, Antichrist IV, hadn't got half pregnant with a black 16-year-old guy who is gay during the day and a stud after sundown, and, wouldn't you know it, a Democrat. Do you think it's easy being an Antichrist in America today?

2007-05-26 04:15:19 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 1 1

People have been saying - especially in this country - that those who do not agree with them, are the Antichrist. It was King George, then Napoleon - see the pattern? That George Bush is the Antichrist, seems fitting, for he has lead this country to do what was 'prophesied'. However, I personally believe that the Antichrist, the rapture, and all that other end of the world stuff is nothing more than pure, unadulterated, crap.

2007-05-26 04:09:13 · answer #5 · answered by The Pope 5 · 1 1

Define Antichrist.

If your understanding of the "anti" prefix is to be against whatever noun it is attached to, then it would be proper to refer to ALL non-believers as "Antichrist". Since George Bush is an avowed Christian, why would he be defined as Antichrist at all?

I believe the number of people who could truthfully be called "Antichrist" is much, much greater than two or three! If you're counting, include Me.

2007-05-26 04:16:14 · answer #6 · answered by Champion of Knowledge 7 · 0 0

I don't think people know what they are talking about, and I don't believe Bush is the Anti Christ, that's what they used to say about Ronald Regan. It's just gossip and people will be people. I personally don't go around entertaining gossip without facts, or gossip period with facts, it's deadly and judgmental...

Oh yes, the book of Revelations has a lot on the Anti Christ. He will say he wants world peace when in reality, he wants to destroy everyone in it. But he will not be able to get others to follow him, and there for this Anti Christ will start wars with the people whom don't want to have anything to do with his world peace bull...

Honestly I don't know the 1st or 2nd Anti Christ. I have to be careful of what I say, my salvation is much more important.

2007-05-26 09:11:01 · answer #7 · answered by HOPE 3 · 0 0

The first was "NERO" the most evil of all [RomanEmperors] the second was "Adolph" who foretold the next great evil empire, called the {THIRD REICH} Now, Today, is classified as "ZERO", meaning there will be no escaping "life&death". For that man who we Americans call President as made a sour deal with a monster who will bring mass [chaos] in spells and poisioness creatures. For the first time, standing room only applies to all flesh. Pray for us, because it has already happened for the fourth time.

2007-05-26 04:17:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

"Hister" is the river Danube, no longer a gross mis-spelling of Hitler. besides, the identity of the subsequent anti-Christ differences weekly - no ask your self extremely given definitely the impossibility of easily attempting to apply Nostradamus to predict something. flow forward, seem at each and each version of John Hogue's e book. He could desire to be as much as a half-dozen diverse anti-Christs with the help of now. It differences with each and each new printing.

2016-10-06 02:11:53 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I may be wrong but in Revelation I only remember 2 anti christ in the end times.

2007-05-26 04:12:19 · answer #10 · answered by Sandy S 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers