English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

any clues and reason and who will start it for what reason ...

i think there is already a small misunderstanding between some countrys , can americans cudnt ban sum sanctions when india and pakistan tested their nucluear weapons ????

do how many of you expectin the 3rd world war ?????

2007-05-25 21:01:47 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

14 answers

Unfortunately, WWIII will be global suicide, therefore in answer to your question, as long as there's rational superpowers who believe in MAD, there will be no WW3. By definition, the next world war wil be nuclear, how could it not. In a nuclear war there will be no winner. In a nuclear world, the only true enemy is war itself.

The next World War will involve a nuclear exchange, how could it not if both sides believe no price for victory will be too high. In the first 30 minutes, nearly a billion people will have been vaporised, mostly in the US, Russia, Europe, China and Japan. Another 1.5 billion will die shortly thereafter from radiation poisoning. The northern hemisphere will be plunged into prolonged agony and barbarity.

Eventually the nuclear winter will spread to the southern hemisphere and all plant life will die. You ask what country would be victorious, you are asking when will we commit global suicide. My answer is it won't happen soon because the larger superpowers are more rational than the rump states in the middle east.

While we hear talk of a nuclear-Iran or a confrontation with NorKor, little is said about the 2 bulls in the glass shop. The arsenals of Russia and the US are enough to destroy a million Hiroshimas. But there are fewer than 3000 cities on the Earth with populations of 100,000 or more. You cannot find anything like a million Hiroshimas to obliterate. Prime military and industrial targets that are far from cities are comparatively rare. Our biggest threat is from an accidental launch by the Russians.

At the point of global suicide, it doesn't matter who is on what side....where you go to hide, or how long you can survive. In a nuclear age like i said before, the only true enemy is war itself.

2007-05-26 07:47:22 · answer #1 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 0 0

Has anybody predicted anything earlier.If you see the reasons for the 1 st world war,the war would not have occured.Some private enimity also caused the war.Only the BIG boss has to keep mum for any outrageous things.If he wants search BIN in all the countries BUSHes automatically the possiblity of 3 rd war.Hope for the best till we alive.Before that do have any reply for this scorching sun,the Mist during winter,no rain during Autum,and all the Ice are becoming sea water and the sea level is coming up, the global warming is becoming high due to eathene gas formed in ponds.

2007-05-26 05:14:57 · answer #2 · answered by panneerselvam s 5 · 0 0

I don't know who will start it, who will be invloved, or when it will happen, but it will happen. Human nature is to not resolve conflicts with reason or logic. Or, is it that reason and logic equals fighting? History tells us that humans have been warring for so long that it would only be natural for a war on the scale of many countries would have to happen. Hell, how many wars are going on right now?

You'd think Iran and North Korea are the biggest enemies, both have the technolgy(kind of), and both have tyrannical sociopaths/psychopaths as leaders. A world war will happen again, but for the next few years or decades, the provisions that have been set in place - the United Nations, etc - will try their hardest to prevent it.

2007-05-25 21:13:23 · answer #3 · answered by Phat Kidd 5 · 0 0

There will never be a war on the scale of WW2 or WW1 again, ever. There is to much at stake. This time we have far more range capability more devastating weapons beter weapons and faster response time. Albert Einstein once said ," I know not the weapons the third world war will be fought with, however I know the fourth will be fought with sticks and stones " what that is saying is what ever weapons we use in the third one will start the end of days planetary. He was right.

You know I can jump into a fighter jet lock onto a heat signature with a AARAM/120/HSGM and fire at a jet from 120 miles away. 62 years ago I couldn't even lock onto crap. 62 years ago They didn't have missles they had Unguided rockets.

62 years ago I couldn't hit a enemy from any where in the world now i can.

62 years ago i couldnt turn a human head into jam from two miles away

62 years ago i couldnt talk to you on radio

62 years ago we where stupid.

2007-05-25 21:11:13 · answer #4 · answered by You have questions I have answer 2 · 1 0

There will be no 3rd war in future. Wars will be fought in the form of sanctions like embargos. America is dictating the terms of countries all over the world since Russia was disintegrated. Now a days war is nothing but financial weaking of a country so that it can toe the line.

2007-05-25 21:22:53 · answer #5 · answered by katkam v 3 · 0 0

ok, now allow me answer your question properly. First, Armageddon is actual the position the position the astounding conflict will ensue, no longer the kind of the international ending. that's a particular valley (also stated as Megiddo) outdoors Jerusalem. might want to that very last conflict be linked with WWIII? convinced and no. the international most appropriate as a lot because the properly will be riddled with wars, tsunamis, earthquakes... yet because this is one conflict and by no ability an fairly warfare, this is complicated to call it that. also, the conflict occurs after the Rapture, which hasn't occurred yet. considering the fact that no individual yet God knows at the same time as the Rapture is, we would have a WWIII the following day and performance the Rapture ensue thousands of years from now. wish this helps.

2016-10-18 10:30:42 · answer #6 · answered by coombe 4 · 0 0

The III world war will be for water and the countries that will be involved will be asian.Two previous wars were European centric and this will be Asian centric as the excitement of progress Will have its head and this will be for water.
As of now scarcity of drinking water has already stated to rear its head in most part of Asia.

2007-05-25 21:23:42 · answer #7 · answered by r s 2 · 0 0

hey don u see its started... n 9/11 was jus way to show it to d media.. it'll not be an open war.. but a cold war.. n its goin on between palestian n israiel n labenan.. n den afganistan n iraq with america.. n many many more places where america is tryin to dominate... its jus matter of time before countries start risin up against america.. n dats wen all of this war tactics will get more interesting.. i don like blood shed but will love to see america fall... in another question it was asked wil america fall if invaded by china.. do u reliaze america is not in a condition even to invade iran because there wil be a great uprise from many countries.. but d war will hav onli two sides one will be against muslims.. which we can see.. n one will be for humanity to protect des muslim countries... if u don ealize des facts please analyze all d countries wer war is goin on...

2007-05-25 23:06:35 · answer #8 · answered by kabir g 2 · 0 0

.
.
Not likely. There are too many Nations not willing to suffer the consequences. With modern weapon, most large scale wars would last a very brief time.
.
.

2007-05-25 21:05:54 · answer #9 · answered by skippy 3 · 0 0

LMAO @ EITrainer
so true
i think a third world war will happen n by the looks of it , its gonna be USA to inititate
hope it doesnt though

2007-05-25 21:25:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers