English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-05-25 19:40:48 · 12 answers · asked by kingdevin1991 3 in Sports Outdoor Recreation Hunting

12 answers

That depends upon one's purpose. For combat or self-defense, I prefer semi-automatics, because they have more firepower, mainly. My Beretta 92F has standard 15 round magazines, and I also have 20 and 25 round mags for it. One can reload a new mag in seconds, so I have much firepower. A revolver is far behind in firing 76 shots. My Beretta 92F is also ultra-reliable. It will function after burial in mud or wet sand. No revolver will do this. It must be taken to a gunsmith. Some people say one does not need this firepower or reliability, but I think of worst case scenarios. I prepare for anything as well as possible.

2007-05-26 03:03:19 · answer #1 · answered by miyuki & kyojin 7 · 1 2

Which is better for what? Each has its place in the scheme of things. The revolver has its virtues. Generally it is easier to use, stronger, more dependable and available in bigger calibers for hunting or protection from 4 legged predators.

The auto-loader holds more ammo and can be quicker to deploy. It is slimmer so easier to conceal for lawful concealed carry. Aside from the behemoth Desert Eagle which is difficult to casually carry because of its huge size, the automatic magnums are: The .10mm, the .357 Sig and some old automatics that were made in .357 Magnum which you can't find anymore like the Coonan.

Glock re-named the Model 20 .10mm The Hunter. It makes sense; it is as powerful as the old .41 Magnum and it holds way more ammo.

If you want something just for home or personal defense, start with the .380 acp or .38 Special if you prefer a revolver. So there you have it. Pick what works for you.

H

2007-05-26 03:04:52 · answer #2 · answered by H 7 · 0 0

Revolvers.

You can't miss often enough or fast enough to win a gunfight.

With revolvers, a malfunction is generally less common. In 40 years of shooting, I've had exactly one revolver malfunction, it was caused by a bullet jumping crimp and binding the cylinder.

Jam clearing drills are a normal part of semi-automatic training.

Another advantage for revolvers is that you can shoot anything that will fit in the chambers, and has enough powder to push the bullet out of the bore. Semi-autos require a full power load to cycle reliably, and if you use heavier than standard loads, the additional recoil will cause damage to the slide, frame, and/or recoil spring system. Additionally, not all automatics will feed all bullet shapes reliably. Semi-Wadcutters, and light for caliber hollowpoints are notorious for causing jams in semi-automatics.

I will take five for sure, thank you, rather than have a maybe 15. If I need more than five shots, I will reload, draw a second gun, or reach for a rifle.

Doc Hudson

2007-05-26 09:34:31 · answer #3 · answered by Doc Hudson 7 · 0 0

Never, never, never ask a question like that. The debate has been raging for over a century and no end seems in sight. Each type has its ups and downs. You just have to decide for yourself which is more suitable and go for it. Or, you can be like some of us poor schmucks, and simply buy a dozen or so of each kind. In revolvers I prefer 38spec/357 mag, 41 magnum, 44 spec/44mag; (you can fire the 38 spec and 44 spec in the magnum marked thundersticks). For semi-autos stick with the 9mm and 45 auto for one simple reason; the plentiful supply of ammo in those calibers means the cost thereof will be lower than others. With the coming surge in inflation as we head into the next great depression (thanks to big oil and our idiot politicians) the price of heavy stuff like ammunition is going to skyrocket so pick up a case or two of whatever you are going to shoot. Then we can all set back and talk about the good old days. Happy shooting.

2007-05-26 05:13:01 · answer #4 · answered by acmeraven 7 · 2 0

For me, the 1911, but the favorite back-up gun is the revolver. Semi-autos when properly maintained may be 99% reliable at most, but the revolver is something else, reliability and concealment are plus factors.

2007-05-26 03:51:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I used a 1911 in the Army, own & love them as well many other semi autos. For personal defense I carry a revolver. The main reason is that I never have to worry about "cleaning" up my spent rounds.

2007-05-26 03:32:10 · answer #6 · answered by fishhunt987 3 · 0 0

A revolver never jams, a semi will. Sure a revolver is only a six shot and some semi's up to15. But if you practice and have the right Cal. you only need one shot. You can depend on the six shots if you need them. A semi. can jam if it don't like the amo you are using or if it is dirty. A revolver is a sure fire thing.

2007-05-27 13:28:19 · answer #7 · answered by rick 6 · 0 0

I think you were saying a cock back gun, which is not even a type of gun. But I believe you are referring to a semi-auto pistol or a pistol that has a slide in other words. Both are fine, but the semi-auto pistols tend to be more accurate and have longer ranges. Semi-auto pistols are also easier and faster to reload.

2007-05-29 12:06:25 · answer #8 · answered by amish_renegade 4 · 0 0

It is a matter of personal choice.. I recommend 357 Magnum or 45 ACP. Auto or revolver in those calibers.

2007-05-26 11:19:16 · answer #9 · answered by dca2003311@yahoo.com 7 · 0 0

I prefer revolvers for personal defense, because of the ease of use, low maintenance, and higher powered calibers. Autos have only one thing going for them, and that is magazine capacity, but you don't need that many shots to defend yourself.

2007-05-26 01:02:13 · answer #10 · answered by Curtis B 6 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers