English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-05-25 16:45:21 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Could Jesus have read the Old Testament?

2007-05-25 16:48:53 · update #1

I'm asking if the Jesus could of had a copy of the Old Testament to read.

2007-05-25 16:53:42 · update #2

20 answers

The answers crack me up! At least a few people here know a LITTLe bit about this.

Jesus would have been exposed to the Torah and yes, that is written on scrolls and it specifically states him reading in the temple from the scrolls. We do not know for sure if he read in Hebrew or in Greek---but he does quote the greek version. He most likely knew Hebrew, Greek, Latin and Aramaic.

The formal JEWISH SCRIPTURES were not canonized until the Council of Jamniah which happend about 70 years AFTER Jesus died.

It is the Council of Jamniah that actually gives us the differences between the Protestant and Catholic Bibles. The Catholics include all texts being used during the LIFE of Jesus....while Martin Luther, during the Reformation wanted to go according to what Jewish scholars put forth at the Council.

The earliest parts of the New Testament would be pauls letters and they come out in the 50's

2007-05-25 17:19:37 · answer #1 · answered by Michelle A 4 · 0 0

If you have read Luke 4, you might have noted that Jesus read from Isaiah 61 in the synagogue at the beginning of his ministry, following it with the words: "Today this scripture is fulfilled in your hearing." Yes, Jesus was familiar with the Jewish scriptures, which we call the "Old Testament". That "Law" that he was going on about with the Pharisees and Sadduccees? That was the Torah, the first five books of the Bible, of which every Jew was well aware, since it was regarded as the foundation of Judaism.

The Hebrew Bible consists of three parts, the Law (Pentateuch), The Prophets (including what Christians call the Historical Books) and the Writings (the Wisdom Books and some other late entries such as Ruth and Daniel). It is the same as the Christian "Old Testament" except the books are in a different order to match their degree of inspiration.

The books were all considered completed by "the time of Ezra", around 400 BCE. As a practicing Jew, Jesus would have been familiar with the sacred scrolls of of his people, particularly Torah and the Prophets. But he never read a word of the New Testament, which hadn't been started until decades after he was gone.

You might find it interesting that the Hebrew Bible had already been translated into Greek 200 years before Jesus was born. That "Septuagint" version was the one the New Testament authors used, and some of its word choices, in connection with their quotation in New Testament, don't quite match the Hebrew originals.

2007-05-25 17:24:33 · answer #2 · answered by skepsis 7 · 1 0

Yes. The Old Testament was written before the New Testament. The New Testament starts with the book of Matthew. Jesus is the New Testament.

2007-05-25 16:53:20 · answer #3 · answered by Hisway 2 · 0 0

This has been an argument for ages. The Old testament is supposedly a history of the Hebrews but a great deal coincides with Egyptian teachings and the Greek concepts of Dionysus. It is generally excepted that the New Testament was written after the time of Jesus but has been revised many times not the least at the Niceaen Council at the time of Constantine.

2007-05-25 16:51:35 · answer #4 · answered by Don W 6 · 0 0

First of all the New Testament tells of Jesus entering Synagogues and reading the Old Testament.

Second, He quoted from it numerous times as recorded in the New Testament.

Third, there were copies of the Old Testament in Greek & Hebrew during His time.

Fifth, the Dead Sea Scrolls are another proof of the compolation of books of the Bible that were copied for future generations.

2007-05-25 16:54:43 · answer #5 · answered by realchurchhistorian 4 · 0 0

He did. And from what was found is that he quote the Septuagint. The way he was quoted in the temple saying, "16"Do you hear what these children are saying?" they asked him.
"Yes," replied Jesus, "have you never read,
" 'From the lips of children and infants
you have ordained praise'?"

We knew from that verse that Jesus was quoting another surce that was not available to the King Jame's translators concerning Psalm 8. What happened was Psalm 8 was changed by certain Jews who did not like the verses pointing to Jesus. So they changed Psalm 8:2 "Out of the mouth of babes and sucklings hast thou ordained strength"

That is: ordained strength the Christians though it was until a Spetuagint was found. And in that Septuagint the true words were there for us to discover. It was those words that Jesus was quoted in the Gospels because he was quoting it, and the deception of those Jews called 'Masorites' was revealed.

The one's who doubt the Bible the most, complain about how long it took after Jesus to write the Gospels. So it would be a very very small portion of people who would think that the New Testament was written before Jesus!

2007-05-25 16:59:40 · answer #6 · answered by Christian Sinner 7 · 0 0

From what I understand ..he studied Judaism .. whether it was written or verbally given to him in the Synagogue (?) who knows...

I believe the Old Testament contains portions or all of the Torah, I'm sorry I didn't read the Torah, so I couldn't say it is an absolute replica.

Jesus was definitely aware of the teachings from the Old Testament.

2007-05-25 16:53:31 · answer #7 · answered by Sapere Aude 5 · 0 0

Jesus ushered in the New Testament.He is the testator!It could not have been instated without him.
Jesus is God's son,so He knew everything God knows.
We are under New Testament law now,but the Old Testament still helps us understand God & how the messiah was fortold of.

2007-05-25 16:52:01 · answer #8 · answered by frogginmama52 3 · 0 0

Jesus undoubtedly read from many of the books that now have become known as the "Old Testament." They all were complete and in active circulation during his time, but many existed in various version with generally-slight differences. He would also have read from Jewish texts that were not accepted into the modern Old Testament, and from texts that have been lost since that time.

2007-05-25 16:58:04 · answer #9 · answered by ladypac4now 1 · 0 0

i've got heard that too. i will inform you, I certainly have a duplicate of the Jewish Tanakh, revealed by the Jewish ebook Society. It has the Tanakh in the two Hebrew and English. i've got not gotten around to comparing and contrasting the full element with the Christian OT, yet I certainly have in comparison and contrasted countless key passages. there's a mushy difference in how idioms have been translated, like in Psalm 22:sixteen, the Tanakh says, "... like a lion, they're at my arms and ft", whilst the Christian OT purely reads, "they have pierced my arms and ft." it is likewise properly-usual that throughout Isaiah 7:14, the word that grow to be translated as "virgin" interior the Christian OT certainly purely means "maiden" or "youthful woman." it might desire to be taken to signify a virgin, yet not consistently. the certainty of the subject is, the OT grow to be translated throughout the time of the lens of Christianity... yet there are not that many variations (so some distance as i've got examine) between the Tanakh and the Christian OT. Now, on your actually question: The OT and the Tanakh are purely approximately a similar, aside from variations interior the translation of idioms, and the translation of a few words. So, the OT grow to be "made" on a similar time that the Tanakh grow to be, this is purely translated slightly in yet in any different case. attempt reading Isaiah fifty 3 interior the Tanakh, and then evaluate it to Isaiah fifty 3 interior the Christian OT, any version. they're just about comparable.

2016-10-13 22:16:49 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers