Yes everyone of us has the right to ak intelligent question. But not on nonsense question or childish question or boyish question. It should be mature and intelligent question .
jtm
2007-05-25 14:22:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jesus M 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Believe whatever you want to believe. The earth is 6,000 years old? Fine. Leviathan was a dinosaur? Sweet. No serious person cares what you chumps believe. Trust me!
I'm all about letting people make up their own minds. I think the evidence speaks for itself. People who dispute evolution obviously don't understand the evidence. But again, "believe" what you will. It's not my business to disabuse cultists of their cult mythology.
As for the "Creation Museum" - same goes. People can erect all the temples to their own ignorance that they can afford - it's a free country. When you say it "presents both views," though, I can just imagine. Evolution is probably presented as "We came from monkeys," with the enlightened Creationist rebuttal being "Then why are there still monkeys?"
2007-05-25 14:25:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by jonjon418 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
The so-called "Creation Museum" (which doesn't present anything about Creation, just misinformation about the wondrous process of biological evolution) is in the business of making sure impressionable children remain ignorant. Unfortunately such intellectual child abuse is legal, so yes, legally they do have the right.
One of the principle lies they hope to propagate is the one you just wrote - that intelligent, educated people who are knowledgeable about science therefore reject the reality of a Creator God. Nothing is farther from the truth. I fully believe in God and I know and love my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. I am also a professional biologist, and I know that no genuine truth of science can conflict with any genuine truth of God. Biological evolution is a fact, supported by incontrovertible evidence - the evidence you refuse to look at because you are so insecure in your religious beliefs. People have a right to know that. Denying such an intricate and beautiful natural process, which like all of nature gives glory to its Designer and Creator, does an intellectual and spiritual disservice to everyone exposed to this farce of a "museum".
2007-05-25 14:24:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by PaulCyp 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Of course the creationist have a right to question it. But they didn't. They just assumed it was wrong and went from there.
No, the creation museum does NOT present both sides - unless you, like them, have no idea what evolution actually says. Then you might fall for that bullshit. But it's bullshit.
They have no evidence. That's the problem. They want evolution to be wrong for some reason, so they say it is. But they can't prove it.
2007-05-25 14:31:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by eri 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
People should question all they like. What I'm against is people who lie, present half-truths, deliberately ignore evidence and try really hard not to understand the issue. I don't advocate closing them down, just showing the world what they are - anti-science, anti-reason, religious extremists.
By the way, what "bias" do the free inquiry groups have? Reality?
2007-05-25 14:26:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by skeptic 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
How can there be scientific view or a museum based on faith? Its like saying PIXIES have a role in the way grapes grow because my grandfather told me so....where is the research? Where is the proof of Creation, other than the text of the Bible. So then are we talking about a Bible Museum.
2007-05-25 14:23:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Laughing Man Copycat 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
I've heard scientists say that the "science" used in the Museum is faulty, with fabricated information to lead visitors to the conclusion the Museum people want them to arrive at.
That would make it useless as an institution of learning. Whomever would like to waste their money supporting it is welcome to. I'm confident that the attendance at the place will be healthy, because some people choose to ignore long-accepted scientific methods and then complain that they are not being treated as competant scientists.
2007-05-25 14:24:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by LC 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
"i'm no longer trolling. I even have been saving up for a month tochronic out and spot this museum. I even have been desirous to decide for over a twelve months. There extremely is people obtainable clever and could see Chrsitian perspectives are the marvelous direction." you ought to have spent the money on a e book containing actual technological wisdom, and the time you wasted traveling this comedian museum examining. (even if, if I ever locate myself interior of sight i could heavily evaluate traveling "for the laughs" - even however i does not choose to grant funds to them).
2016-10-06 01:42:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's just more of explaining faults with imagination. ID is pure fiction. The only "evidence" for ID is the lack of evidence seen in certain parts of evolution. Making up an idea called "God/Creator" to explain what can't be explained is NOT science.
2007-05-25 14:26:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mega 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
The Atheists are so funny. They believe so hard that there is no God, they are precupied with someone they believe does not exsisted and fight to proove their is not God. The are the ones with closed minds. Free Inquiry, they are so inconsistant!! It cracks me up that it is such a hot issue!
IF CREATION IS TRUE, SO BE IT!
IF EVOLUTION IS THE TRUTH, SO BE IT.
I think it should be discussed and looked at empirically and scientifically. Lets be open and objective.... Lets see what happends, maybe we might learn something.
2007-05-25 14:28:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Chuck D 1
·
1⤊
2⤋
by suggesting that something called the "creation museum" presents both views fairly and accurately is laughable. and generally people don't care if individuals believe in God. but the fact is, religious groups attempt to affect legislation in this country. it's the act of forcing their beliefs on the public that people resent.
2007-05-25 14:23:37
·
answer #11
·
answered by j 3
·
4⤊
0⤋