in the context of war, yes.
and that's the way some of the Muslims see it, so that's why they hold that position.
2007-05-25 04:38:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Yahoo admins are virgins 5
·
1⤊
4⤋
Suicide bombing is an accepted practice by just about every military force in the world. If you are mortally wounded in combat, it's a noble and worthy sacrifice to conceal a grenade underneath you, so that when your captors come to finish you off, they'll have a surprise waiting for them.
That's why the military is trained to roll over wounded bodies and use them as a shield in case that wounded soldier does exactly that.
2007-05-25 04:48:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unless it's like that film (forget the name) about the asteroid hitting earth and Bruce Willis has no choice but to become a suicide bomber to save mankind then it is acceptable. Nothing is acceptable if it results in taking innocent lives just bcos of a so-called cause.
2007-05-25 04:48:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by JasonLee 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Suicide Bombing is acceptable but only against actual enemy combatants. To view an entire race or faith as the enemy is twisted. Suicide bombers that blow themselves up murdering the civilian population is wrong.
Should you be in a war and can sacrifice one soldier for the lives of multiple enemy soldiers then this is acceptable. Not ideal but acceptable.
2007-05-25 04:42:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Rambler 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I am not relitious at all and still will tell you that there is no excuse for doing that other than just what you said to create terror. Terroronly gains in the very short term but later looses much more than it bargained for.
Susuicide bombing has no real value and gains nothing.
2007-05-25 04:50:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I guess you would have to be Japanese to understand the reasoning for such an act. They thought it was acceptable.
Anything after them is copycat.
From the christian view, no, it is not acceptable, I do not think the act of sacrificing your life, to save another should be considered suicide, but some might.
2007-05-25 04:54:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by bluebird 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Human nature being the fickle thing it is, we may appear to be sympathetic to peoples plights, but were not, its definitely a case of "least its not on my door step", thumb down all you like, people like Galloway, Cherie Blair (possibly you) who condone suicide bombers would be singing a different tune if one day your love ones were blown in the air by some halfwit, brainwashed idiot
2007-05-25 04:42:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Look, if you want 72 virgins, you gotta do what you gotta do. Give these poor guys a break. They are losers in this world, but have a prayer for 72 virgins in the next. They have nothing to lose, but their miserable lives, which doesn't count, and so much to gain.
2007-05-25 05:36:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Fred 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
properly, in basic terms the Wahabbis, Salafees and Deobandis look doing surely a form of work, suicide bombing ie. between the worst bidaah dedicated with the help of those human beings contained in the call of Islam. How unhappy and shameful!! the appealing shariah of Islam has specific and shown strategies to positioned a stop to oppression and persecution. Even in concerns of strive against, to illustrate, all rules were laid out explicitly with the help of the great imams of Ahl Sunnah wal Jamaah. Fitna (Slander/Dissension/Upheaval/Chaos) takes position at the same time as the works of our large acknowledged alims (scholars) of the previous aren't to any extent further referred to and abided with, yet we take the Quran and Sunnah and attempt to interpret it in our personal stupid and deviated strategies. might want to Allah Taala look after us all.
2016-11-27 02:29:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
absolutely not. i could never class suicide bombing as being acceptable. fair enough if those people wish to end their lives, then fine, if they feel the need then that is there decision no one else can say it is right or wrong. but what i do not condone and never will is the fact they have to kill and harm so many other people while killing themselves. in my eyes it is unnacceptable. just my personal opinion, we are al entitled to our own. interetsing question also.
2007-05-25 04:45:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by obsessed_with_yoo 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think there are many things in this world that are abhorrent but nonetheless sometimes necessary.
Perhaps WW2 would have gone differently if a suicide bomber had got to Hitler. Who knows.
2007-05-25 04:38:17
·
answer #11
·
answered by Dharma Nature 7
·
3⤊
0⤋