English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-05-25 02:52:46 · 9 answers · asked by peter2156 2 in Politics & Government Military

9 answers

I love posting this conspiracy theory...

In the first few lesson of a basic economics course, they cover Monopolies and Cartels. Cartels, a group of suppliers, such as OPEC, corner markets by artificially controlling and restraining the supply of any item in demand, such as oil, to drive up prices and profitability. Typically under a free market system, Cartels typically fail due to the cheating element when one member secretly cheating against the group by selling under the table. It only takes one major supplier to cheat to break the Cartel. When this discipline fails with the Cartels, the whole thing falls to the free market system where prices match a natural level of supply and demand.

With that in mind…take a look at Iraq before George W. Bush. A 10 year war with Iran and complete devastating loss to the Americans in Desert Storm has beaten Saddam down. Broke and barely hanging on to power Saddam is bribing every sympathetic UN officials during the “Food for Oil” program. He trying to get sanctions lifted so he can make it to the free market because he is desperate need of money to hang on to power. Plus he is now hates personally the King of Saudi Arabia and the Emir of Kuwait and would love to burst their OPEC bubble. If Saddam makes it to the free market with his oil, he makes a bunch of money and he hurts his rivals, the Kings of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.

To preserve OPEC, The King of Saudi Arabia tells George W. Bush that Saddam must go. Bush and the Arabian Kings trumped up charges of WMDs against Saddam along with some other bad stuff, which were probably true. Americans are so mad after 9-11 they don’t care who gets their Azzes kicked. Saddam is removed to preserve the OPEC oil cartel not save us from Saddam blowing us up. No WMDs were found.

Proof is simple. After five years of Saddam’s removal, No Iraqi oil is hitting the world market. The Iraqis are buying oil from the Saudis/Kuwaitis to keep their daily lives going. Americans are paying for the rebuilding of Iraq.

Now if my theory is correct. Who LOST? Bush has spent billions getting close to a trillion of US assets to preserve OPEC. We have lost 3000 or so troops during this process. At home, the US consumers got robbed at the pump and the domestic economy had got strangled due to the high cost of energy. Who WON? All friends of Bush: OPEC Members, Texas Oil Business People, and Military Contractors.

Don’t believe me ask any college economics professor if what I’m saying is plausible. If I’m right, maybe conservatives should start questioning their country’s leadership about their motives. If this is true we all have been cheated, liberals and conservatives alike.

2007-05-25 02:59:35 · answer #1 · answered by Laughing Man Copycat 5 · 1 3

The Labour occasion has continuously been the occasion of BUST, Harald Wilson replaced into compelled to devalue the pound and have a member of the worldwide economic corporation sitting on all economic concerns in the 70's so that's no ask your self that we've an identical subject now. the only element that concerns me is that the regular public in no way learns and could little question return yet another Labour government as quickly as the Tory's or whoever takes over has mended the mess.

2016-11-05 08:32:33 · answer #2 · answered by gennusa 4 · 0 0

well, there were no WMD's. there were no ties to Al Qaeda. And Brook, watching the videos of 9/11 will tell you nothing about the Iraq war, because they're not related.

And as for all the terrorists there, they weren't there before we invaded. Saddam Hussein may have been an evil dictator, but at least he kept the terrorists out. After all, he was a secular leader, and had no use for them.

And if your answer is that we removed said evil dictator, then you are living in a sadly misinformed world. There are plenty of worse regimes in the world that we routinely ignore. Much of Africa, for instance. And how about Kim Jong Il? He's worse than Hussein, and actually has WMD's, which he has actually threatened us with. But Bush says we "have to use diplomacy". Where was the diplomacy with Iraq?

2007-05-25 04:09:53 · answer #3 · answered by thelightedtorch 3 · 0 0

Oh jeez, another war,.... where´s Irag??

i mean, money is money is money.....

after $1 billion what´s the point anymore?

stop terrorism, and to bring about some democracy to the middle east,

2007-05-25 03:39:38 · answer #4 · answered by James R 3 · 0 0

History Lesson:
Watch the reruns of the 9/11 planes in case you've forgotten. Remember, Saddam Hussein and his crazy sons, Uday and Qusay. Also does Osama Bin Ladin ring a bell. Have you heard about all of the muslim extremists that hate America and everything about it. They even hate the troops that are over there helping them to get a better govt.

2007-05-25 03:02:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Depends on whose truth you want to listen to. Because apparently, everybody is right and they know sooooooooo much better because of course they have all the classified information on everything sitting in front of them. The only people that know the "truth" are the people that can't tell you.

2007-05-25 03:09:40 · answer #6 · answered by Harley 6 · 0 1

The Truth is Out There

2007-05-25 02:59:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

hell i don't know the truth and i just got back from there. i was for certain we'd find chemicals but so far only trace amounts, intell says they were sent to syria and iran weeks before the attack. but i do know every terroist in the world that wants to destroy everything about america is in iraq. just be thankful we are fighting them there instead of here.

2007-05-25 03:21:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Truth is that we cant leave until we have won, or it will belong to Iran.

2007-05-28 20:23:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers