www.creationwiki.org
This is the lamest bunch of psuedo-science ever asembled. One common tactic is to cut and paste a section of a serious scientific article about a discovery made by a phD. and then the paster writes his own little two cents at the bottom with nothing to distinguish his comment from the article itself.
Like an article about a partially mineralized fossil that was found with a little bit of orginal material left in it. An interesting find but nothing crazy.
The poster then notes at the bottom, "Hard to believe that this unfossilized bones is millions of years old, isn't it?" Like the fact that this fossil didn't completely fossilize somehow challenges the age of dinosuars. They conviently cut out the part of the article that mentions where the PhD had dated the find. And the site had no answer to the fact that thousands and thousands of dino fossils have been uncovered and dated to a time millions of years ago.
If this is the best you've got...
2007-05-25 02:52:37 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
You could spend hours digging through this trash bin and you'll not find the first thing that resembles real science or anything remotely like proof.
2007-05-25 02:53:52 · update #1
Verifiable proof are required before something can be called a theory. That's why scientists are always careful to qualify claims, like this planet COULD POSSIBLY support life. And pluto still exists as an astronomical object, they just clarified the definition of a planet. They didn't know there were so many pluto-like objects in the outer reaches.
2007-05-25 03:43:01 · update #2
The best they have is conjecture and baseless attacks. They don't even have a proper theory. Not only are they not right, they are not even wrong. To be right or wrong, you have to be able to weigh evidence against the claim. Their claims are not even defined well enough to do that.
They have nothing.
2007-05-25 02:56:06 · answer #1 · answered by nondescript 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Creationists aren't the most scientifically or logically adept people in the world, but then neither is Science if it can educated 5 billion people that PLUTO IS A PLANET and then say, oooops not it ain't!
Maybe science needs to grow up before we teach in schools.
We have dozens of probes on Mars taking soil samples, sending pictures, doing experiments and NO SCIENTIST CAN DEFINTIVELY SAY if there IS or IS NOT life now or ever on Mars.
Yet they look at wave undulations of a STAR 30 light years away and PRONOUNCE A LIFE POSSIBLE PLANET
Reminds me of when they used to say MArs has canals.
Now, is THAT science.
WHAT PROOFS lay behind that statement of LIFE POSSIBLE PLANET. Have they ever sent probes to stars and found a LIFE PLANET and said, see that PROVES when we see undulations there may be life!
Have they
WHERE are the PROOFS to back up such a WILD conclusion and why are SCIENTISTS MAKING SUCH WILD CONCLUSIONS
A PH D does NOT give you the RIGHT to make things up!
The bottom line is THEY DON'T KNOW, they're just making it up.
Just like the Creationists do
I see no difference for there is NO EMPRICAL DATA TO SUPPORT SUCH A CONCLUSION
I thought EMPERICAL DATA was a requirement
I thought VERIFYABLE PROOFS were required to support theories.
2007-05-25 10:21:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why go through all the difficulties and troubles to understand all the books that write or try to discover how humans or creation developed or evolved. The Bible keeps all this simple and you shall not be wrong. The more one writes or reads the more will one get into confusion. Thank God for the Bible. Why believe creation can come in other forms, you will not live to see the proofs. Neither the bible will give you any other proof until you return to God to ask him. But if you miss him, you will never be able to know how you come from. Because you will never have a chance to ask him when you are down under instead of with him in heaven..
2007-05-25 10:04:43 · answer #3 · answered by Ptuan 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's sad that people are in such denial.
It's like how astronomers developed the concept of epicycles to explain how the earth could still be the center of the universe. It is actually a pretty well thought out theory and does actually help explain some observations but is completely false.
2007-05-25 09:59:40 · answer #4 · answered by Don't Fear the Reaper 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
"You could spend hours digging through this trash bin and you'll not find the first thing that resembles real science or anything remotely like proof."
As a former evolutionary scientist, that's exactly how I feel about evolution. Not real science.
2007-05-25 09:57:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
No Ken Ham is the new one.
2007-05-25 09:56:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
So....... One man's interpretation and ranting about the topic means all of us Christians are like that?
2007-05-25 09:58:43 · answer #7 · answered by capitalctu 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
pretend youre in church here....we dont care about science here.....God MADE GRAVITY AND SCIENTISTS WHOOPTIE WHOOP HE KNOWS MORE THAN THEY DO!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-05-25 09:55:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋