The differences are mostly ceremonial. Auxiliary bishops are still ordained bishops and have all of the episcopal faculties of Bishops (for example the ordination of priests and deacons) and should they end up being given their "own" diocese there wouldn't be another level of Holy Orders conferred on them. They can say Mass in the Cathedral but some of the ceremonial details differ. They are not ordinarily allowed to do the "big" ceremonial stuff in the dicocese...like the ordinations of priests unless they are given permission by the Bishop (for example if an ordination was scheduled and the Bishop was very ill, one of the auxiliaries might step in for him). Their actual duties would be assigned to them by the archbishop of the Dicocese to which they were attached.
From Catholic Encyclopedia:
The criminal and important causes relating to auxiliary bishops are reserved to the Holy See, those of lesser moment to the Congregation of Bishops and Regulars. By virtue of the office of auxiliary he has a perpetual right to a pension suitable to maintain the episcopal dignity. This is to be paid by the diocesan from the diocesan revenues. The amount of pension and source from which it is to be obtained is generally specified in the Apostolic Letters of appointment. He can hold any benefice he had before and acquire a new one after his consecration, as the office of auxiliary is not a benefice. He enjoys the same honorific privileges (with a few exceptions, viz. throne, cappa magna, mozzetta, and rochet worn without mantelletta, and crosier), pontifical ornaments, and titles, as does the diocesan. He can and must use the prelatial dress, as in the Roman Curia, to wit: rochet over the purple soutane with purple mantelletta, in his attendance in the cathedral, where he has precedence over all other canons and dignitaries, as to choir stall and functions. When he is celebrant in pontifical functions, the canons must assist, but in the usual canonical dress, except ministers in sacred vestments. Not all the canons are bound to meet him at the church door, as he enters to celebrate pontifical Mass. During the ceremony he is assisted by a canon as assistant priest, and deacon and sub-deacon in sacred vestments. He has no right to the usual two canon-assistant deacons, nor to the seventh candlestick, nor to the usual reverences of the canons at Kyrie, etc., nor the use of the throne or crosier unless by special permission. He uses the faldistorium. He can use the crosier with the special permission of the diocesan, and when he officiates at ordinations, consecrations, and other pontifical functions, during which the rules of the Pontifical demand its use (Caeremon. Epis., I, xvii; Decret. Bracharen. Sept. 1607). It is proper, however, that he impart the episcopal last blessing. He cannot bless publicly the people as he wends his way through the city. It is forbidden him to make visitation of the cloister of nuns without express permission and command of the local prelate. Canons are bound to kiss the auxiliary's hand when he gives them Holy Communion on Holy Thursday, and assist him in consecrating Holy Oils, conferring Holy Orders, and in all sacred functions strictly episcopal, which he performs for his diocesan. If he be a canon, he is subject, as the other cathedral canons, to diocesan law and the penalties attached to its violation. If the diocesan and the auxiliary assist simultaneously at Mass, the sub-deacon must not give the latter the pax before the canon-assistants at the throne have received it from the bishop ordinary. When the diocesan assists at Mass, or Vespers, the auxiliary must leave his stall and join the other canons in making the prescribed reverences before the Kyrie, Gloria, etc. Should the celebrant be the diocesan, assisted by the chapter in sacred vestments, the auxiliary can wear a cope and a linen mitre (with consent of the local), which latter he must take off and put on by himself. It is expedient that he substitute another in his turn for the Missa Cantata, as he cannot use a faldistorium and pontifical vestments without consent of his diocesan.
2007-05-25 04:10:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sister Spitfire 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
According to canon law, a priest appointed to the vicarate general retains always the right to continue on in that position (or at least an episcopal vicarate) for the full duration of their term, should they wish. The bishop ordinarily cannot remove them.
This accounts for why some priests remain in the Vicar general role even when the bishop gains an auxiliary bishop: the vicar general has a legal right to stay on the job.
One thing that a priestly vicar general cannot perform are the 'pontifical' functions of an auxiliary bishop - consecrating the oils on the Tuesday of Holy Week, ordaining ministers, and acting as the ordinary minister of Confirmation. The vicar general may be delegated the administrative functions of a diocese, but no bishop can delegate the sacramental and pastoral role of a bishop to someone who is not also a bishop.
Auxiliary bishops are most useful in providing assistance in these areas, and in assisting with the shepherding of the flock of the diocese. And of course, being the head of a titular bishopric, they are learning the ropes needed to someday oversee a diocese of their own.
2007-05-25 04:11:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by evolver 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
A auxiliary bishop is assigned to a Catholic diocese (or archdiocese) to assist its residential bishop (or archbishop).
For example, the Archdiocese of Los Angeles is broken into five pastoral regions each having its own auxiliary bishop. A sixth auxiliary bishop heads the Ethnic Ministries of the Archdiocese.
http://www.archdiocese.la/about/auxiliaries.html
With love in Christ.
2007-05-25 18:36:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by imacatholic2 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
you may want to learn the present, besides as early heritage of the Anglican Church to understand all this. In a nutshell, the american Anglican Church (TEC) has been very accepting of gay persons, and they have ordained a gay Bishop and different gay clergy. The Anglican church homes of the united kingdom and Canada are also transferring in direction of acceptance of gay human beings. also, lots of the international's Anglican church homes ordain women. yet it truly is often about the problem of accepting gays. Conservatives in the Anglican church sense very alienated with the help of what has happened. they have self assurance homosexuality is sin, and that it gained't be condoned. at the same time as they could by no potential recommend kicking gays out of the Church, they could by no potential elect to ordain an brazenly gay man or woman to the clergy. because of this many clergy and lay human beings have left, and could go away, those Anglican church homes. notwithstanding, in North u . s . and huge Britain you'll see no more advantageous than about 5% -10% of the clergy and laity go away the Church. Anglicans are a extremely liberal lot in those places. the actual tale is what's going to take position to the international Anglican Communion as an finished. i imagine you may want to work out many finished Provinces (meaning nationwide church homes like those of Uganda, to illustrate) elect to leave the Communion see you later because the Communion recognizes the u . s ., Canada, and the united kingdom. Its going to be a tragic, messy, and critical time for Anglicans over the subsequent few many years. yet i'm particular we are going to get with the help of by some potential.
2016-11-27 01:31:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by bulgarella 4
·
0⤊
0⤋