well that certainly makes you think , hmmmm whats the most important , if you were born with no feet you could have prosthetics made and you could learn to walk , but if you were born with no knee's that would be tough , but in later life you can have a knee replacement operation but a foot replacement would be hard , so it would be the prosthetics again , so i think that your knees are the most important, so as your mam says you really should look after them as best you can , lots of long hot baths and rest on the sofa for you my friend . hope its betta soon
2007-05-25 04:39:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Simon t 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both are important but without your knees you couldn't bend or run or walk even, however without your feet there are a number of things doctors can do to replace those so you can do everything that someone with feet can do... so not that I want my feet cut off but I would pick that over not having knees that work I guess.
2007-05-24 19:33:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Yomi Minamino 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, but some others view it that way. OMG, BAREFOOT! The only thing a flip flop provents is a bare dirty sole (but some flip flops even dirty the sole from the dye coming off the foot bed), and protection from heat that would cause blisters to untrained feet not used to hotter heat (but I don't actually get blisters until above 100 degrees F and also during afternoon peak heat hours, even if the feet are quite burned). The toes and the arch are still quite visible even with the flip flop straps. As for a "perv" with a foot fetish--there are various levels from just looking at the soles/toes/arches and liking the appearance, and then all the way to wanting to do activities that are kinky or painful to the feet.
2016-05-17 09:22:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If Your knees where gone what good would Your feet be?
But if You dont have feet, Who needs knees. There both pretty important and Yes we do take are body's for granted until You injure it.
2007-05-24 19:36:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by randy9089 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Feet
2007-05-24 19:53:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Tony T 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Think I would go for knees. You can probably walk on stumps but not being able to bend at the knees would be a real bummer!
Think of all the everyday events you need to bend at the knees for....going up and down stairs for one.
2007-05-24 19:55:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by Christine H 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both as you would require them to get around. However in saying that you could possibly waddle without knees but you wouldnt be able to stand at all without feet. They spread our weight out over a larger area and make it possible to do many things such as running etc.
2007-05-24 19:34:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ian M 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hard to answer!
Without my knees I couldn't run, without feet I couldn't run, both aren't good for the addiction of running.
I suppose knees are the vital process of running and one could learn to run with balls instead of feet? If their addiction was controlling enough. *twitch*
2007-05-24 19:50:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both are important but you really should look after your knees when younger.
2007-05-24 19:39:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by pups 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
they are equally as important. if you have excess pronation in the arch of your foot, it can cause knee pain if not addressed. Your knees are also very important. You need to find out why your knees are bothering you 1st.
Dr. Ali
2007-05-24 19:30:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by alirhirsa_2000 2
·
1⤊
1⤋