English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-05-24 11:20:05 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law Enforcement & Police

I mean for me to have a audio recorder in my pocket, or a video camera in the car

2007-05-24 11:27:38 · update #1

13 answers

Probably varies from state to state. In my jurisdiction it is fine. Besides I'm video taping you anyway. Feel free to video tape me being my usual professional self as I put the law on you.

You will have to put the camera away if you are getting arrested or if your actions interfere with my investigation.

2007-05-24 11:38:52 · answer #1 · answered by El Scott 7 · 3 0

Get a No Cost Background Check Scan at https://bitly.im/aNN82

Its a sensible way to start. The site allows you to do a no cost scan simply to find out if any sort of data is in existence. A smaller analysis is done without cost. To get a detailed report its a modest payment.

You may not realize how many good reasons there are to try and find out more about the people around you. After all, whether you're talking about new friends, employees, doctors, caretakers for elderly family members, or even significant others, you, as a citizen, have a right to know whether the people you surround yourself with are who they say they are. This goes double in any situation that involves your children, which not only includes teachers and babysitters, but also scout masters, little league coaches and others. Bottom line, if you want to find out more about someone, you should perform a background check.

2016-05-20 06:15:40 · answer #2 · answered by Lynn 4 · 0 0

Maryland does have a wiretapping regulation that covers the recording of deepest conversations. there turned right into a case in Maryland in which a motorcyclist tried to list his site visitors stop with the help of a state trooper, he become arrested for violating the wiretapping regulation. The State lawyer for Maryland stated that the type of recording likely did not violate the regulation. A site visitors stop isn't a private communique. So, you could legally list the site visitors stop. yet, and it truly is an significant huge yet, take a lengthy look at your digital camera, cellular telephone, micro recorder. . ., small, silver or black colored, extremely unsuitable for a gun. And, you'll whip this up and element it at an officer who already is on a intense alert - because site visitors stops get law enforcement officials killed. if you're fortunate, the cop will omit you with the first couple rounds he fires with the help of your door, providing you with time to duck some thing of the mag. in case you fairly elect to attempt this, position your digital camera or recorder on the sprint, then at the same time as the officer receives on your door you could tell him you elect to list the site visitors stop and talk about the recording gadget on the sprint. If he tells you that you won't be able to list the stop and could be arrested in case you try. Then save on with his order and then ***** to his manager. rigidity the problem, and also you get charged with yet another offense that then you definitely might want to spend time and money protecting in court docket. save in options the officer receives paid to be in court docket, at the same time as you may want to omit artwork.

2016-11-27 00:17:02 · answer #3 · answered by headlee 4 · 0 0

Yes, you can audio/video record a policeman's actions as long as what you are using is not used to hit him over the head! A policeman may ask you to put the audio/video recorder away, but state that under the bill of rights, he is not allowed to take that away or search your car if you are not arrested, or if he doesn't have a warrant to remove the camera.

2007-05-24 11:23:56 · answer #4 · answered by Dan 2 · 1 3

The California officer is WRONG. You do not need PERMISSION to record anything on a public road. You MAY need for all parties to know they are being recorded, but you DO NOT have to ask. He is correct that it is not about the 1st amendment.

2007-05-24 13:10:55 · answer #5 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 1 0

It is unlawful to record communications without permission, if the officer knows your recording him, he may instruct you to turn the camera off. If you fail to comply with his instructions, you may be arrested pursuant to 148(a)(1) PC; Resist, Delay, or Obstruct a Peace Officer in the performance of his duties.

So, contrary to that other guy that posted up here, you don't tell the officer "it's in the bill of rights" because it isn't, the officer knows that, you'll come off like an idiot that doesn't know the law, and you'll go to jail.

Just be polite to the officer, or don't do whatever you were doing to get stopped in the first place.

2007-05-24 11:39:44 · answer #6 · answered by trueblue3167 4 · 1 4

So long as you ask there permission, and they consent, Otherwise I beleive its a privacy violation. There are so many laws its hard to get them straight. I know that if you record someone, and there is no audio, then this is legal, but if there is sound, it then becomes illegal. Dumb if you ask me.

2007-05-24 11:24:05 · answer #7 · answered by melissaw77 5 · 0 3

Yes, most cars already have dashboard cameras, hence how we get all the Cops footage. It's for your and their safety. However realize at any time during questioning you have the right to remain silent and don't have to answer any of their questions.

2007-05-24 11:22:29 · answer #8 · answered by jay k 6 · 1 3

the officer does not have to tell you that you are being video taped , he or she does how ever have to tell you your audio is being recorded and you have the right to have them not record you voice . because like the law says you have the right to remain silent .

2007-05-24 11:26:47 · answer #9 · answered by Dr.Bucksnort 7 · 0 4

Its legal, but if they are aware you are doing it, the tape or film will be destroyed.

2007-05-24 18:03:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers