English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Haha does this sound weird? I dont know.. well yeah. Would you prefer a girl to be fit but skinny, or like skinny with no muscle at all.

2007-05-24 11:03:50 · 18 answers · asked by HiLovely 3 in Family & Relationships Singles & Dating

18 answers

Well I'm not a guy but I'd prefer that they like someone for what's inside. Skinny is what you make it and no one stays that way their whole life. But you're right, they do mostly want skinny and my prediction is most are going to say with a little muscle. It would look gross to have none at all, wouldn't it?

2007-05-24 11:08:03 · answer #1 · answered by fourzenuff 2 · 0 0

Hmmm . . . that's a good question. Maybe this ranking would give you an idea:

Will not date:
7) Like, manly women (bodybuilders that look like they're on steroids or something)
6) FAT girls
5) Too athletic entirely (almost manly because they spend so much time playing sports . . . look like they might be able to beat up a typical guy)
4) Too bony entirely (look frail and likely to be hurt)

Will date:
3) Slightly chubby girls
2) Skinny but not fit (you know, what you're talking about)
1) (*) Skinny but fit (exercises regularly, without going to extremes). Reasonable amount of body fat.

(*) is the ideal, because women like that are healthy but not freakishly athletic. Good night!

2007-05-24 11:26:32 · answer #2 · answered by anonymous 7 · 0 0

I prefer women that are tone, with a little meat on their bones, but I get turned off if the woman has too much muscle. I like a little padding on the butt and hips, but no cheese. Keep it tone, but don't buff up.

Here are some reasons men might not like women with muscles:

1. Sub-consciously men think women are supposed to be fragile and dependant on them.
2. Men don't like to feel threatened by women
3. Women with muscle might make a man more self-conscious
4. Men might feel like the woman might be a closet lesbian

2007-05-24 11:11:10 · answer #3 · answered by JMoney 2 · 1 0

Fit and skinny do not describe anyone. You cannot be both.

You can be slender and fit. You can be average and fit. You can even be stocky and fit.

I prefer people with padding on their bones. I despise those wretched skinny bulimic girls whose bones are poking out everywhere and their eyes are hollow. They look like death warmed over.

2007-05-24 11:09:16 · answer #4 · answered by Blue 6 · 0 0

fit is always better than flabby. in your case, we aren't talking about that much of a difference. on the other hand, the less flab, the less the size of the chest. guys, for the most part, like a little meat, but not anything chunky. don't get me wrong, every man wants the supermodel g/f

2007-05-24 11:07:24 · answer #5 · answered by muscle bound hunk 3 · 0 1

fit skinny for sure!, is there anything sexier, than a slight hint of muscle definition in a womans legs, makes me melt like butta, "aint no Parkay aint no Margarine, strichtly buttta"...:)

2007-05-24 11:09:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fit skinny. I work out hard at the gym, and I like a tonned, well defined girls. they're hot!

2007-05-24 11:06:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Skinny does not matter to me. I just don't date women who weigh more then I do. So anyone over 180lbs is out. Even if she weighs that much and it like 6'4. Then I won't date her because she is taller then me! I have so many rules!

2007-05-24 11:47:15 · answer #8 · answered by G Money 6 · 0 0

fit skinny is a lot better, otherwise she's just like a couple of poles put together and that's not that attractive.

2007-05-24 11:08:17 · answer #9 · answered by #1bob 4 · 0 0

Fit and toned is good but not buff and muscular. I'm not into the body-builder he-man type of girl. Being in shape is good, being in the shape of a man is not.

2007-05-24 11:07:35 · answer #10 · answered by bumblyjack 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers