Being the only person who has read all of the answers my 300+ questions have received, and having correlated the various viewpoints expressed, there is most certainly a number of people here at R&S who fit the "Christian" descriptiuon I gave in an earlier question.
Indeed, more than a few "christians" point to others as being "christian" (ie "christian in name only").
I can count on one hand the number of genuine Christians I've met here.
So when you tell me I don't know what I'm talking about, are you claiming you have read all the answers to all my questions and have come to a different conclusion?
Or are you shooting off your mouth because ego is an essential ingredient in modern "christianity"?
2007-05-24 10:19:26 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Way to go, I am proud of you....... seems a lot of confessed Christians only try to hurt with their words here in answers instead of trying to build up there fellow Christians. Didn't God say something about, although you call my name, I know you not......knowing me that isn't exactly how it goes but I think I may have a point....
2007-05-24 21:19:00 · answer #1 · answered by She Said 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your question shows that you're already conscious of the answer. certain, the outline of ways progression 7 collapsed become very extremely left out from the 9/11 Conmission rfile. notwithstanding, an identical clarification of why the dual towers collapsed also explains why progression 7 collapsed. I n reality progression 7 is a clue to the different 2 homes, consequently of leaseholder Silversteins order to 'Pull it'. All 3 homes were destroyed with the help of managed demolition. yet an excellent stranger truth is that there have been no planes in touch both, For information of both, see the web pages less than
2016-11-27 00:06:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I imagine when most people tell you that you do not know what you are talking about that it has more to do with your limited scope of information. Yahoo! Answers much like Wikipedia doesn't exactly qualify itself as a reputable source.
Just because you have all the answers to your own questions dose not make you an all wise and all knowing individual. Nor dose it give you the power or right to judge people and their faiths. What exactly is a "genuine Christian" anyway?
So in conclusion, I think the only one "shooting of (their) mouth" is you.
2007-05-24 10:26:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Who am I to be obliged to read all the answers to all your questions? And who are you to scoff at other people's egos, when your own ego seems to be doing a fantastic job in revealing itself in this question? Who are you to give "descriptiuons" about what the "perfect" christian should be? Incidentally, I agree with the fact that there are only a few people who are truly christians, and it's a good thing that people have finally realized that being a true christian is like living in hell.
2007-05-24 10:35:57 · answer #4 · answered by Maus 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I answered your earlier question (nicely, I might add :D) and while I didn't find it offensive, I was upset that you gave true Christianity, as outlined in the Bible, a bad name by claiming that your interpretation was it "in a nutshell."
I agree that many on here who claim to be "Christian" fit into the nutshell you described, but I will never agree that Jesus Christ's life and footsteps fall into it, because that is simply not the case.
It's unfair to hold a perfect message accountable for the actions or misdeeds of the imperfect who read it.
There are genuine Christians out there- you just have to look closely :0)
2007-05-24 10:27:44 · answer #5 · answered by danni_d21 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
As a non-Christian, I find the term "genuine Christian" to be mendacious.
They are equally Christian, but some of them are very bad at it.
2007-05-24 10:22:46 · answer #6 · answered by LabGrrl 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No I believe that's what you are doing. Shooting off your mouth on some ego trip. You obviously don't know what you are talking about and are trying to convince someone of your intelligence of which you have little. Kisses BB.
2007-05-24 10:27:08 · answer #7 · answered by Betty Boop Oop A Doop 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
good one.... they band together only when ganging up on some non christian... Atheist by their nature are different from each other, we discuss, share our wisdom... debate even, but we see each other as we are...HUMAN and nothing but.. We learn through observation and life experience, we are absolutely unique for no two persons share the exact same experience through life... Many call themselves christian and without us to condemn, without pagans or non christians to condemn they would rip each other apart... why? because what they believe in was founded on war murder and violence... they are the producers of the most violent and negative energy on earth... Today we have laws making them as accountable for murder as the rest of us are... it use to be christians were forgiven for murder.. how convenient... but they can't help what they are... violent so when they no longer have the capacity to murder and get away with it they are verbally emotionally and spiritually violent. even onto each other.
2007-05-24 10:36:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not being a Christian, I doubt whether you understand what a "genuine Christian" is.
Unless you are defining the term yourself.
Which is convenient.
2007-05-24 10:23:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
if i said i was a doctor, made my id Dr.(insert creative name here), and answered question relating to medicine, does that make me a doctor?
what was in your question was what psuedo-christians believe, not actual, practicing, know what they're talking about christians(note: this isnt a no-true scottsman fallacy because Christiany doesnt actually teach the things you posted)
2007-05-24 10:24:10 · answer #10 · answered by (insert creative name here) 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋