think how Ironic...they tell you we have no creator..we evolved out of nothing..the earth just evolved one day, then sea life micros atoms fish primates etc..
But the Virgin Birth is impossible?
Let me get this straight...we are to believe all existence came from unknown origin and formed from nothingness, But God can't form Life?
We "Christans" agree God created everything from nothing, so thanks for proving us right.
same senirio differant explanations.
2007-05-24 08:42:21 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Science just states the same thing. out of nothing became life of earth animals and man.
bible explained it thousands of years before science..was dark void and without form. God said Let there be Light.
so read Genisis, science just backs it up, thanks
2007-05-24 08:55:39 · update #1
I'm not talking about a shark etc. the Holy Spirit fell upon Mary so she'd have the baby, just like Gods breath gave man life.
2007-05-24 08:57:44 · update #2
malak...you got my point...they believe nothing created life...it's just was...but when we say God Is and Was and will ever be thats logical ?
2007-05-24 09:00:27 · update #3
and no ones talking on "sharks" the point "is" you believe we everything came from nothing....OH OK that's reasonable..don't avoid and dance around the point...
2007-05-24 09:02:38 · update #4
writersblock73...aren't yous the ones who claim men came from animals? so if aniamals can do it why not humans? thats your theory not mine... so once again your theory PROVES Bible right ..thanks
2007-05-24 09:05:24 · update #5
Funny how the atheists are always telling us how illogical we are, how God is just not logical. Now a big bang from nothingness creating everything, that's logic!
2007-05-24 08:51:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Virgin birth? I'm not sure whether you're referring to the article about the shark this week that had produced a baby shark without being impregnated, but this is nothing new in the animal world. It's called parthenogenesis (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parthenogenesis ), and it's when animals reproduce asexually to produce, basically, carbon copies of the mother of the species. It can be used in time when sexual reproduction would be unfavorable.
As another point, isn't the idea of a virgin birth sacred to the Christian ideology? (It is, I was forced to grow up as one.) So if I'm right and you're talking about this shark article:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6681793.stm
How is this proving anything for you? It's only showing that what you held as sacred can happen as a natural occurrence in the real world, and I would take that as more of a hurting factor than a helping one. If it actually did happen (It didn't), then some mystical angel of god wasn't involved at all, from your reasoning.
I suggest you take a freshman college biology course (or AP if you're in high school), it really explains a lot of things out that you're trying to disprove with a two-thousand year old book.
2007-05-24 08:53:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The moment I see a hammerhead shark leading followers, I just might start agreeing with you. That's the birth you're referring to, right? It also occurs with some reptiles. Many species of clown fish can change sexes to enable reproduction, too. Bacteria and many other single-celled organisms divide, providing other means of reproduction.
Other than the Bible (and given many of its other statements science has proven false, it's far from reliable), there are absolutely no accounts of immaculate conception in human beings.
It's funny how you cling to whatever science backs you up, while dismissing the rest.
[Edit] Looks like I was wrong this whole time.
Pebbles and Bam-Bam are actually getting away with it, aren't they?
2007-05-24 08:51:43 · answer #3 · answered by writersblock73 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Actually "they" never said there was no creator. You can believe in evolution and God. Hell, I think something so complex, dynamic, and beautifully orchestrated as the evolution of the universe, could only come from a creator.
Where is the part in your question where science proved the virgin birth happened and that creationism is true? Have a link or something?
same senirio differant explanations
-And what makes your explanation correct?
2007-05-24 08:54:27 · answer #4 · answered by Liberals love America! 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nope. If you want to prove to me a HUMAN virgin birth is possible, scientists have to have a documented case of a female (who cannot be in the presence of ANY males) who has spontaneously become pregnant without a male partner.
Just because certain animals have been able to do it, doesn't prove the Abrahamic deity.
2007-05-24 08:51:53 · answer #5 · answered by swordarkeereon 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Science makes sense. Some invisible being that lives in the sky that magically poofed the earth into existence does not. Think about it. And if everything has a creator, then who or what created GOD??????
2007-05-24 08:46:52 · answer #6 · answered by *Cara* 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Maybe these animals (i assume you refer the the "virgin Shark birth") have evolved to the point where they can reproduce without copulation.
FYI science "says" this happens frequently, it's called parthenogenetic reproduction.
2007-05-24 08:55:53 · answer #7 · answered by pastor of muppets 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't really understand your question since I don't recall science proving virgin births. All the virgin births I've heard about have happened in reptiles, so if you're comparing the virgin Mary to reptiles, aren't you thinking in evolutionary terms?
2007-05-24 08:49:45 · answer #8 · answered by Java 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Well, if that's the case then Mary would have given birth to a daughter.
2007-05-24 08:49:05 · answer #9 · answered by Doc Occam 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
the Virgin birth is improbable because of the availability of sperm already and the common knowledge that an egg and sperm create a life already in that time.
there are lots of things that aren't impossible, just improbable.
2007-05-24 08:46:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋