One right that black people were happy to have and exercise when trying to defend their families from lynch mobs was...
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
They knew they could not depend on law enforcement and had to depend on themselves for survival. That they were afforded the right to own and use the best tools for self-preservation is no small matter.
2007-05-24 10:23:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by floatingbloatedcorpse 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
you may no longer decide the strikes of an finished team based on the action of a few. So what if some gay human beings had hateful and racist feedback to assert approximately black human beings. do you comprehend what meaning? they're ignorant. and that i quite doubt those that pronounced that could desire to additionally be a similar ones comparing the civil rights flow to the gay rights flow. additionally, rapid ingredient notice right here, those strikes exceeded off over 40 years in the past. i'm 20. have been you there? circumstances are lots distinctive than they're decrease back then. yet it continues to be annoying, that's extra suitable to be gay now than it ever replaced into in that ingredient era. For all you comprehend, the white people who have been helping the civil rights flow could have been gay, which replaced into why the appropriate. Who somewhat is familiar with. i'm so uninterested in this "who replaced into oppressed extra" interest that human beings prefer to play. I exceeded off after 9/eleven, I observed this talk teach the place a black female and a muslim female have been arguing approximately who's struggles have been worse, somewhat than discussing a thank you to make all of it better usually. there are a number of similarities between the civil and gay rights strikes, yet there are variations to boot. Had the civil rights flow no longer exceeded off, the gay rights flow probable by no ability could have began. think of of the gay rights flow as a results of fact the civil rights flow's protege. additionally, comparing the gay rights flow to the civil rights flow supplies human beings wish. It replaced right into an prolonged, annoying conflict, yet in the top, the conflict replaced into gained. Civil rights have been given. It supplies wish that if genuinely everyone purely hangs in equivalent rights for the LGBT community will get carry of to boot.
2016-11-26 23:28:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The rights of a free American citizen are the same for all and technically they had them.
The problem was that different states had laws that impeded the free exercise of those rights.
A good example is voting all American citizens back then had the right to vote but in some states they had poll taxes the prohibited them from voting because they couldn't pay, and they had literacy tests and so on.
The fights was not for rights but for the ability to exercise them. In some cases these laws were even upheld by the supreme court as constitutional.
The wikipedia article referenced below has good info in it.
2007-05-24 07:31:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Thomas from Miisk 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
My thoughts may be unpopular but, I think they have always had the same rights. I also think some of these rights were violated, but they were still lawfully given rights. The right to vote is/was for everyone, including black people, but the voting registrars, etc. violated that right. The right for an education was there, but the southern schools violated that right. Restaurants, drinking fountains, etc are rights that were violated by the police. But they were still rights granted to all.
2007-05-24 06:58:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Brown VS. Board of Education (1954) History everyone should learn. Click the link below if you don't know anything about this case.
2007-05-24 15:05:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The basic right is the right not to be discriminated against on the basis of race.
The civil rights act made it illegal for people to be fired due to race, to not get an apartment due to race, to be excluded from restaurants due to race, etc., etc.
It was NOT about the right to vote as was mentioned above.
2007-05-24 10:25:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Isaac H 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
-Eating in white-only facilities
-Learning in white-only schools
-Drinking from white-only fountains
-Sitting in the front of the bus, where whites could sit.
That was focused in the South, but many Northern states had similar laws.
I hope you see a pattern...oh and voting rights under the Fourteenth Amendment were not enforced for African Americans.
2007-05-24 08:48:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by prezalex87 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
They had the right to breath, unless their keeper decided for them to stop! What a question!
2007-05-26 14:21:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by Regina 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
the black people couldn't vote, so laws were made to exclude them. they had separate restrooms, drinking fountains, everything. different schools meant different education, usually poorer. they had to live in one section of town, across the tracks.
2007-05-24 06:58:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by wendy_da_goodlil_witch 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Eat in restaurants, drink from water fountains, play in parks, you name it.
2007-05-24 06:52:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by Nice 4
·
1⤊
1⤋