she ran a storage facility in AZ and was apparently breaking into the units and stealing stuff(wrong,i know),she sold a rocking chair to her mother and the cops went to her moms house,saw the chair and mom not knowing said her daughter sold it to her.THEFT&TRAFFICKING IN STOLEN PROPERTY!!mandatory minimum
but if you drink and drive and kill someone you only get like 3 years???
can anyone possibly tell me why this should be okay??
2007-05-24 04:46:53 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
the daughter got 7.5 years-
2007-05-24 05:09:53 · update #1
a class 2 felony in AZ carries a 7.5 year sentence-whatever the felony may be.it just seems like alot of time for stealing a rocking chair and selling it.and yes i looked up her crime on the website.
2007-05-24 07:01:12 · update #2
The same reason that Charles Manson will spend the rest of his live in jail yet never physically did anything. Did he manipulate young people into killing someone yes, but does the military not do that every day. So if Charles can rot in jail for 60 years why not every single president? They possess the knowledge that this is happening thus making them accessory's, same as Charles, but on a far greater scale. Nazi officers were convicted of war crimes as were other top officials around the world by the United States, yet Truman killed more innocent Japaneese people in a week span by dropping the atomic bombs than most other did for the entire war (Germany excluded) yet he is not guilty of any war crime in the eyes of the same people that that convicted the others.
This is a justice system that let OJ walk, enough said.
2007-05-24 05:01:28 · answer #1 · answered by allybill2 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's the good and bad with Mandatory Minimum's and letting some things slide thru like the DUI Manslaughter. Maybe you could launch a protest to get the law changed?
2007-05-24 05:00:27 · answer #2 · answered by Scott 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your friend was put into a position of trust in her job and was paid to make sure nothing would happen to the belongings. If some stranger had done this same crime would not have received as long as sentence.
2007-05-24 04:56:47 · answer #3 · answered by Walkerfire 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who got the 7.5 years, the mom or the daughter?
The justice system is by no means "fair", and thats a sad statement to make, but its true.
2007-05-24 04:51:56 · answer #4 · answered by sweetie_baby 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i'm shocked they accompanied her to your husband. individually, i might propose returning her to the shield....you're actually not any the place close to arranged for a canines this length. Your husband became on the suited song by way of going to the shield....yet whilst he's going to get a canines this is the full opposite of what you needed, he needs to be there to shield it. in case you truly need to maintain the canines...SHE needs to be totally knowledgeable. Get her into training or come across a coach that can start up working together with her right this moment. it truly is a breed needs a definite style of proprietor, the suited environment, the suited guidance, and countless love with the intention to truly do nicely. bear in mind that pitbulls have been knowledgeable and bred to be aggressive, so as that they actually take countless artwork to try against that. With the suited domicile, they are in a position to be truly super canines. as quickly as she is knowledgeable, that guidance needs to be saved up...you are able to no longer only prepare her as quickly as and assume it to stick.
2016-10-13 08:14:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds fair to me. You got to remember that there are plenty of people who would have killed her for stealing from them. If she had ever been caught in the act, it could have been the last thing she ever stole.
2007-05-24 06:00:30 · answer #6 · answered by Nicholas P 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess your friend should have been drinking and driving, instead. Seriously, though, it's apples and oranges, and neither crime is acceptable.
Your friend was paid by unsuspecting people to safeguard their belongings. Instead, she knowingly and willingly broke that trust and sought to personally profit from it.
2007-05-24 04:54:31 · answer #7 · answered by Curious1usa 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Drinking and driving = not necessarily with the INTENT.
Stealing , then selling - from your clients?
I must admit - that is a long time though.
2007-05-24 04:56:06 · answer #8 · answered by darwical 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you Cant do the Time then Dont commit the Crime,
2007-05-24 05:05:45 · answer #9 · answered by conranger1 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
How about "intent." death is not intended in a DUI, depriving someone of their property is intended in a burglary. Just a thought.
2007-05-24 05:00:11 · answer #10 · answered by California Street Cop 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋