Lol - the latter, obviously.
2007-05-23 16:54:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Both have their flaws.
The word Rapture is not even in the Bible. The account most Christians believe comes from an insiduous and spiritually damaging novel called Left Behind, which is Biblically inaccurate and dangerous. The flaw it creates in some Christians is a blind alligence to political Israel and in others a lack of care about the future. Why care when the saved will get to fly up into the clouds pretty soon when Christ comes back?
Evolution does not stand alone. As a science it still needs the existence of a creator.
2007-05-24 00:07:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by steve h 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Evolution easily
The rapture is based on false interpretation of the evidence but even if it doesn't happen at the beginning of the Tribulation the resurrection is going to happen. At least if you believe the bible at all.
Evolution is based on false interpretation of the evidence but the very hypothesis is riddled with suppositions and error and falsified fossil records as to make it entirely ridiculous. Macro evolution would take longer than you all claim the earth has been around and if there is micro evolution there would be definite missing links that could be found when some species changed drastically.
2007-05-23 23:58:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Tzadiq 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
I really don't know about the rapture, but Evolution would be more ridiculous. 1) It is taught as fact when it is really Theory. 2) Evolution has gaps, leaving certain issues open for debate. And Fossils support both sides.
2007-05-24 00:13:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Da Mick 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
the belief that is more ridiculous is evolution (of man) rather than rapture. for rapture is for real, it is of no doubt real, and no one can change that fact for God is the one who mentioned about it. there will really come a time for rapture and that should serve as a warning for each and everyone of us. god bless! =)
2007-05-24 00:03:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by 1:57 PM 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Evolution is not a belief. It has been proven time and time again.
The rapture is something that hasn't happened yet. Since of the two this is the only "belief" I'll pick this one.
2007-05-23 23:56:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by knujefp 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
Rapture.
2007-05-24 00:06:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Speaking of belief, I would cross evolution out.
What do we have left? Rapture, right? There you go, the Rapture
2007-05-23 23:55:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Your weird. Evolution is science. Rapture is something like being in love.
2007-05-23 23:55:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Lionheart ® 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Both are equally stupid with Isalm making 3 of a kind
2007-05-24 00:02:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Rapture relies on fantasy and scaring people. Evolution relies on fact. Guess which one is stupider.
2007-05-23 23:55:13
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋