Whoever said in what is He, held that He is contained; and whoever said on what is He held He is not on something else. He is a Being but not through phenomenon of coming into being. He exists but not from non-existence. He is with everything but not in physical nearness. He is different from everything but not in physical separation. He acts but without connotation of movements and instruments. He sees even when there is none to be looked at from among His creation. He is only One, such that there is none with whom He may keep company or whom He may miss in his absence
2007-05-23 14:14:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
What is 1+1? Don't give me any of that 2 nonsense... we all know it's 3. Seriously, there is an answer, and though you don't like it, or have trouble grasping how it could be so, the answer remains the same. As for getting back to the very beginning and suggesting that there may be a God, this can be mathematically suggested. Email me for details.
2007-05-23 14:17:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You know what I asked a Priest that same question... and he told me just to have faith and not to question the almighty or some crap like that. I believe god was created cause some kid asked there parents where they go when they die and they made up some story that led to religion. I don't think anyone can answer your question though.
2007-05-23 14:17:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by dark_orchid6 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
i hate to burt your bubble, but i can't give you a name. God HAS always existed. It's not a load of crap, it's the truth. it's hard to understand, and i don't completely understand it, and i've spent MANY hours trying to figure it out, but it's a faith thing. You just have to believe that He's always been, becasue that's just how it is. When i get to Heaven, that's one of the first things i want to ask God though.
2007-05-23 14:22:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by JesusFreak777 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
not another stuppid question, been on the juice or the bongo have we, ok it was the martian digod, he had sex with Another marshianess by the name of degodess, and the child had a memmory problem so they called him god incase it caused confusion to the child god in latter years, and as we all no know it was of no consequence and the parents need not of worried their poor martian heads, because the confusion was with the poor sods that came latter not with the child, ok has that cleared it up for you, now you know are you any the wiser????
2007-05-23 14:25:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by mr T 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You'll never understand if you keep thinking that way. You need to transcend your mind in order to find that answer. It cannot be properly expressed in scientifc or dynamic reasoning. Close answers like this ' The sudden rise of consiousness' are still not adequete enough to satisfy this question.
2007-05-23 14:24:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by See ya later aligator 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
you make a lot of assumptions and no proof?
We dont even know how we came to be, you cant be making assumptions about God.
Personally i think because there cant be nothing because then there would be nothing to have "nothing", so there has to be something.
And God isnt constrained by time, therefore creation point is impossible.
If there was a higher power than God, then He'd be false and the higher is true God.
2007-05-23 14:15:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by aznfanatic 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Kaiser Wilhelm II, there I gave a name take it or leave it.
Something has to have not had a creator, most atheists put their faith in the universe I put mine in God, a matter of faith.
2007-05-23 14:14:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's very obvious that YOU aren't looking for an answer. If you were truly looking for an answer to this question you would not be so rude in your question!
Sometimes we need to accept the answers given when we don't know. The Just "Was" answer is exactly Right! accept it
2007-05-23 14:21:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by Frank M 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Invisible pink unicorn
2007-05-23 14:14:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by deadmeatuk2 4
·
0⤊
2⤋