English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Perhaps Christians see no difference between a gay person, a Hindu who worships idols, a pedophile and a goat rapist but let's get REAL here!

An idol worshiper or gay person does not harm me, my family or wider society. A child molester is OBVIOUSLY dangerous. A kid cannot consent to sex as it is not emotionally mature enough to understand the ramifcations of such an action. It is proven to be harmful for the child and is rape.

As for an animal....well EW! There couldn't possibly be any mutual emotional connection involved. An animal cannot possibly understand what the hell is happenening or why even if their body is physically responsive to the act. It is animal cruelty AND rape!

You can make love to a consenting adult human but you will never be able to make love to an animal, or child it will always be one-sided and thus ethically WRONG.

Am I the only one who sees a VAST difference between a relationship between two gay adults and the other two?

2007-05-23 09:34:40 · 23 answers · asked by pixie_pagan 4 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Are those comparisons made to make people who do not believe in the bible or see being gay as a sin see gay people in the same vein as criminals and rapists etc?

Cause I don't know if it actually works. Most rational people don't see ANY similarities between the two.

2007-05-23 09:36:54 · update #1

Skakekaw, most people who are gay were raised by STRAIGHT parents. There are no facts to back up that gay parents raise gay kids.

Audax, your information is also unsupported by facts. The vast majority of people who engage in anal sex are heterosexual couples. There is no ONE sexual practice typical of gay men. You obviously know little of the subject.

Besides, who am I to judge what two consenting adults do in their bedroom. I am sure there are things you and YOUR husband do I may find distasteful.

2007-05-23 09:46:39 · update #2

23 answers

The short answer is, ignorance, fear, and hate.

2007-05-23 09:40:59 · answer #1 · answered by Carol 2 · 3 3

I've read some of the puerile responses, but certainly Audrix at Fidel's approaches the sublime!

It's interesting how Christians see homosexuality as exclusively a male thing. You never hear about Lesbians. Just males. Audrix is under that impression, and also under the impression that gay sex is limited to anal intercourse, which heterosexuals themselves practice, and that procreation is the only reason people have sex.

The vastness of the collected ignorance and myopia of Audrix in particular and some of the other posters in general, gives one a rough idea of the infinite.

2007-05-23 09:54:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

"Perhaps Christians see no difference between a gay person, a Hindu who worships idols, a pedophile and a goat rapist but let's get REAL here! "

That's the answer to your question right there. The Christian faith believes that believing in someobody other than their god, homosexuality, pedophilers, sex with animals is all sin. That's why they're placed in the same "group". So if you're straight, but you're a Buddist, you're the same as being gay or raping animals in their eyes.

2007-05-23 09:43:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I trust you. they ought to outline more beneficial what someone is charged with. I stay in NC and they ought to tell if any sex criminal is on your community and they even grant you with there address, call and image on-line. i do no longer opt to guage people and they ought to inform more beneficial what there crime become rather of anybody assuming they raped or molested a toddler. they prefer to regulate the regulation. a toddler molester should be for them pervert that mess with little ones and by no ability basically the random individual that tangled up doing something, that they opt to call a sex criminal. anybody is such in a up roar to be certain those people stay round them and some are not to any extent further what they look. yet people have a tendency to imagine the more serious and prefer I reported they ought to outline it more beneficial or change the regulation. The unusual difficulty is i do no longer see to a lot of them up there that are charged with fairly rape, maximum are those who made dumb judgements and were given stuck, maximum of them were probley inebriated on the time anyhow.

2016-10-18 09:55:57 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

All Christians have the responsibility to be "Christ Like" as the name implies. That means not judging your fellow man. Thats God's job from what I understand. I am a Catholic (an announcement that makes most gay people and other "fellow" Christians cringe), and I try to follow what the intentions of Jesus were (if you remember the apostles were former murderers and theives with prostitutes in the mix). I work in the ICU where people come to us in life or death situations from all walks of life. You can't tell me that my gay coworkers are evil. They work twelve hour shifts providing care to dying people and support to their families. They are saint like to me in that respect. And if I am wrong... may I gladly burn in hell with them.

2007-05-23 09:48:18 · answer #5 · answered by EmK 3 · 1 0

People who are sufficiently shallow cannot tell the difference between these, or between a person who commits abortion and a suicide bomber. Depth of thought is something that religion can remove from christians.

2007-05-23 10:27:05 · answer #6 · answered by Fred 7 · 1 0

These people tend to be lumped in the same category because the bible list such people who commits these acts as an abomination to GOD. So that is my opinion on why this happens.

2007-05-23 09:41:32 · answer #7 · answered by I'm You 2 · 2 1

It's part of the slippery slope argument - you let people marry someone of the same sex, you'll have to let them marry children or animals or even inanimate objects. Where do you draw the line?

You have outlined the problem with this "argument" - marriage must be between two consenting parties, and children, animals, and inanimate objects clearly cannot consent.

2007-05-23 09:41:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Most of the time those comparisons are made because all of those things are extensively discussed in Leviticus together. You're right a homosexual might not hurt anyone...but when they start trying to adopt children (who will have a higher probability of becoming gay themselves because they live with parents who will glorify the sin) and attempting to change the concept of marriage the way God intended it...then they are infringing on my religion and my right to believe like I choose. The Bible does not condone it. It's not that I hate gays, but I think what God thinks.

2007-05-23 09:41:03 · answer #9 · answered by stakekawa 3 · 2 4

The only animal associated with Gays are Gerbils... Lol.
The reality is people fear gays because they fear the unknown, the fact is those people are problem around gays and don't even know it. My mom came out at age 27 she was married twice.

2007-05-23 09:40:43 · answer #10 · answered by Snooter McPrickles 5 · 2 2

Religion breeds hatred and several answers in here are proof of this.

2007-05-23 09:55:37 · answer #11 · answered by Scott B 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers