2007-05-23 01:31:37 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
God doesnt exist.
2007-05-24 02:29:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
God also had Adam & Eve without clothes, because sin has not enter into the scene yet, & when sin did, The first thing they did was to cover their private parts, I wonder why they did not cover their mouth since this religious world thinks it was eating an apple that caused the sin, The original sin was not an apple, But Eve gave in to the serpent & had a sexual relationship with the serpent & she then knew that act can also be used for pleasure, & not only in God's due time to reproduce another offspring of Adam. Cain was the son of the serpent, LISTERN, that serpent was an upright creature, the only time you can put him into the reptile family is during the curse, & God also Greatly mulitply the woman's perion & conception & she lost the knowledge when she can conceive, The animal Kingdom did not lose their knowledge of God's law of reproduction.
2007-05-23 08:44:14 · answer #2 · answered by birdsflies 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Adam and Eve weren't people.
"X and Y were in the genetic workshop and they were raw" is a better interpretation than "Adam and Eve were in the garden of eden and they were naked."
The serpent is radiation, the tree of life is the primordial soup, the tree of knowledge is the emergent DNA.
Tree. Trunk and branch. Genetic divergence.
Am I the only person in the world who understands that this part of Genesis is talking about evolution? The symbolism is both obvious and undeniable.
Why do you think creation of other 'people' wasn't mentioned? Because Genesis wasn't talking about people as individuals but as a genetic code.
I do not believe in your god and yet I am nonetheless astonished at the genetic knowledge that is displayed in this book. I can't explain how it got there when even after the mangling of the bible by the council of Nicaea, nobody knew about genetics in this detail. How can you not accept this interpretation when it is a mystery that points to divine knowledge being passed down? It actually causes me to have some doubts about my disbelief.
2007-05-23 08:34:57 · answer #3 · answered by Dharma Nature 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No.
Disobeying God's orders is normal.
Ecclesiastes 7:20
There is not a righteous man on earth who does what is right and never sins.
So, even if you are correct and God ordered us not to where clothes, which he did not, it would be natural for us to disobey. Even a righteous man sins.
Christianity is about redemption from sin, not complete abstention from it.
2007-05-23 08:36:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Errrrr.... I think it would be a whole lot more difficult to slide out that womb with clothes on. It's a really tight fit even without them, you know. And the extra friction would be even more excruciating for the mother....
2007-05-23 08:50:17 · answer #5 · answered by shahrizat 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, because after Eve ate the fruit in the Garden of Eden, he found some animal skins to cover them up.
2007-05-23 08:34:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no eternal place of torment as taught by the Catholic church.
Hell [ Greek/Hades] is to be eliminated.
As such it cannot be eternal, lasting forever.
(Revelation 20:14) And death and Ha′des were hurled into the lake of fire. This means the second death, the lake of fire.
Which one is the 'hot' place?
2007-05-23 08:41:52 · answer #7 · answered by pugjw9896 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All people on Earth now wear clothes.Surely we all don't have to go to hell for this? Heaven will be empty.lol
2007-05-23 08:40:13 · answer #8 · answered by werewolf 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
God gave Adam and Eve coats to wear
the apron was not enough to cover them
2007-05-23 08:46:48 · answer #9 · answered by Noble Angel 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. The human race would have died out without clothing so what would be the point?
2007-05-23 08:33:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Did he order us to not wear clothes?
2007-05-23 08:33:34 · answer #11 · answered by optical illusions 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋