When did this evolution versus creationism thing start?

Question

I went to an Australian Christian school ithe 1970s, and was taught normal science including evolutionary theory. I never met a creationist there. Anyone who might have thought that Genesis was a literal historical account would have been considered a bit mad.

I have a set of of 9th Edition Encyclopaedia Britannica at home, published between about 1875 and 1885. It is considered one of the finest editions of the most respected encyclopaedia in the world. Nearly all the academic writers would have been Christians - Lutherans, Prebyterians, Church of England folk and even some Catholics. The science is outdated now, of course, but very good for its time.

The "evolution" section, as well as the sections in biology, zoology, etc acknowledge the genius of their near contemporary Darwin, and there is no hint of any serious intellectual opposition to his theories.

Now I get on the net and read about this thing called "Creationism"

So what happened between 1875 (or 1975) and 2007

Answer 1

Hi Snout! Here's a scooby snack *toss*

Check out the Scopes Monkey Trial. That's when it really started hitting the proverbial fan, so to speak.

Answer 2

Evolution was not a large theory in 1875 - it was not known to the public, it was not generally accepted as standard science. The real creationism movement began when evolution began to be taught in public schools, and word began to get around that people *gasp* actually "came from monkeys" (long story short). The common public, up until that point, believed (and still believes) that the 7 day "creationist" viewpoint is the correct one, and that evolution is only a "weak theory" meant to do away with God.

Hence, the debate. This debate, by the way, is really mostly an American thing. It's not a big thing in other countries, who generally do not get so... literal... about holy books. Hence, your lack of experience with it in Australia.

Answer 3

It started 6,000 years ago. The planet had recovered from the Ice Age long ago, mankind had evolved for millions of years already, and then God decided to create Adam and Eve in the exact image of those evolved human beings.

Not very original of God, I know, but He probably needed a good subject for his first book.

Sorry, this is the only possible manner in which I could show respect to both theories.

What obviously happened is that if Darwin is right, and all evidence points to that, the Creation story in Genesis is false. Which must be a very scary conclusion for a lot of people. How to trust God, if the basis of His story is false? Make it into an allegory? Or simply try to debunk everything that could eventually prove God wrong?

Obviously some people chose for the latter. I can understand how people need a God-of-the-gaps, I honestly do. It can be scary to not know things. I don't have that problem, but I understand how people might need that.

What I don't understand is people creating new gaps, to simply fit their assumed God into. That's just beyond silly.

Answer 4

It does show evolution. You open with a premise that's purely fake. Genetic info is the terrific we've and it proves evolution notably a lot definitively. Tadpoles to frogs and caterpillars to butterflies isn't evolution that's metamorphosis. You variety of allude to the "variety" argument. properly if i will over the gap of 10,000 years breed a wolf right into a spaniel does that qualify as evolution. i think you may argue that they are the two canids and that is appropriate. whether enable's shop going. quite of 10,000 years enable's come back in one hundred,000, or a million, or 10 million. might you nonetheless argue that what you have is a canid? After 10 million years they may well be so diverse from one yet another they won't be considered an identical "variety" no count how some distance you stretch it. precisely how some distance might you stretch "variety"? I as quickly as asked a creationist if placental mammals might qualify as a variety? They pronounced confident because of the fact that they are all placental mammals. I then recommended them that people, bats, canines, whales, deer, tigers and so on have been all placentals. it extremely is a good type of "micro-evolution" is it no longer? in case you will say "issues shop an identical elementary make up", you may desire to define your words needless to say, because of the fact meaning in spite of the fact which you sense "elementary" might desire to propose at that top 2d. people and elephants are in actuality an identical. they are mammals, they provide delivery to stay youthful, they have a recommendations, a heart and a liver. as quickly as you get handed the obtrusive differences we are in reality an identical. additionally, there are lacking links. 1000's of them. Palaeontologists have maximum of lacking links they do no longer comprehend what to do with them. purely google some. "There are no longer any lacking links" isn't something extra advantageous than a creationist mantra.

Answer 5

Creationism is not the alternative to evolution, ignorance is. Old Testament Fundamentalists, not Christians, believe in the literal truth of the Bible and thus stick their fingers in their ears and go "la la la" whenever anyone attempts to show the fallacies of such a belief.

Evolution is science just as physics, chemistry, biology, geology and astronomy are sciences. To reject the science of evolution is to reject all science. If people want to do that, that is their privilege but they have absolutely no right to inflict such views on children.

Answer 6

I do not pretend to be old enough to go back that far but it was started by satan, He is a liar and the father of lies [John 8:44] but i know when it will end, at the grave, and/or 1Thess 4:15 For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive [and] remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep.
4:16 For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:
4:17 Then we which are alive [and] remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.
4:18 Wherefore comfort one another with these words.
Find out more free bible lessons www.amazingfacts.org God bless email me also [e-mail]

Answer 7

since darwins paper on evolution threw natural selection, religion has tried to discredit his findings. they even went so far as fabricating his moment of death saying he made a last minute conversion before he died.

now scientists like richard dawkins have put in their will a clause to have an observer present at their death bed to prove that they dont convert.

Answer 8

From the beginning.

Answer 9

i expect you'll find that people decided creationism and evolution are incompatible. people never seem to think: ok, it took 7 days for God to create the Earth. Now, how the heck long is one of His days?

Answer 10

I think it started when the first microbe was eaten by a plankton.