Exodus migh have occured...and there are hyroglyphics in Egypt that talk about a mass migration of cemites...and discuss to a certain extent all 10 of the plagues.
And if I am not mistaken they do speak about moses...and abou the parting of the seas.
I saw it on the history channel (The Exodus: Decoded)...so I feel it was pretty accurate information. It is, however, a pretty new theory...and I believe it has not yet been acknowledged by the mainstream scientists... The problem is that if these archeologists are correct then that means that Exodus occurred @ around 1500 BCE...which is way earlier than originally assumed.
Remember that the Bible makes no mention of Pharoh's name...or the year (because that didn't exists back then).
2007-05-22 16:29:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Julian X 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I certainly have asked myself the precise same question. And, regrettably I had to pass by a lot soreness to attain the respond. The Bible, can not be used, as you pronounced to show the life of God, a author. yet, I do think of that a human's psychological capacities enable them to apply the Bible as slightly the puzzle, in the event that they prefer. purely as they might use the Qu'ran, the Vedas and Upanishads, Greek and Roman delusion, the Eddas (Norse delusion). there is a few thing intangibly distant, yet close sufficient that each and every human civilization, regardless of being geographically remoted, had the innate feeling in the direction of recognizing a greater rigidity. there's a god, or God-like being in very almost each and every society. Now, that's, finally a private determination no count in case you think in God or no longer. i'm hoping you hit upon the solutions you're finding for. such as you pronounced, the Bible is specific through religion, yet, perhaps, by some extra study you may desire to bind it with corroborations in different religious areas. There are an overwhelming type of parallels from the Bible to different myths and religions.
2016-11-05 01:58:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Q'uran was written after the Bible, so although it is another spiritual book, I don't think it can be used as primary evidence.
And the Jewish Torah, is the Old Testament in the Bible, (so that would not qualify, as primary evidence, either).
There are no mentions of Moses in Egyptian history, hieroglyphs or nothing else for that matter.
It's almost like it really didn't happen.
2007-05-22 16:26:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sapere Aude 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
The Bible is the only source on Moses' life, unless you get pretty creative. The Exodus isn't even mentioned in Egyptian texts... you'd think they'd miss that many people.
2007-05-22 16:22:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Doc Occam 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's highly unlikely the Egyptians would want that part of their history to be known
2007-05-22 16:25:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mosses is mentioned in the Quran.
Girl down below, just because something was written after another scripture it doesnt make it any less relevant. It's like your trying to say that only the first is relevant, anything after doesnt hold any water.
2007-05-22 16:23:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Nanook~Maybe I need a longer Name?~ 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
The Egyptians were known to "erase" history that they did not want to have recorded.
2007-05-22 16:24:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by pinkstealth 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
The Jewish Torah.
2007-05-22 16:24:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋