English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

Again you are wrong...perhaps you might stop following the Muslim propaganda and pick up the true word of God and judge for yourself. The true word of God is still intact from many centuries ago there have been parts found in the DSS and Isaiah is available in it's entirety they are very much the same scriptures you sill find today and are the same as when Jesus himself taught from Isaiah and said he would fulfill the prophesies of Isiah 53....Isiah 53 describes the Messiah and his atonement for sin...this from 250 BC If Jesus agreed with this scripture why is the Quran not in agreement?

2007-05-22 10:40:09 · answer #1 · answered by djmantx 7 · 6 1

If you think thats incredible, you should check out the original manuscripts; I teach directly from them, and lots of times people ask me if I am from a cult, because they never heard of lots of it.
In the King James 1611, the original translators wrote a letter that tells you that in trying to get the fuller or deeper thought thru to the English from the original Bible languages, so much of it is lost. Its just
because that deeper thought doesn't come thru quite often.
Things like Cain and Abel being twins, for example. Another example is the three earth ages (if people understood these, then they would never say the earth is only 6000 years old).
I teach the students who learn nothing or learn nonsense from Churches who do not find it important to have a teacher onboard who can handle the manuscripts and the languages. Its a shame, they are missing so very much information, and alot of that information is vital to the understanding of
the Bible. A person cannot build truth onto a weak foundation. It won't stand. Then, they find what they think are seeming inconsistancies and contradiction.
Its a damn shame.

2007-05-22 10:56:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The bible is in a constant state of editing and refinement. Several of the original books have been removed due to their possibly 'un-christian' content. Remember that the Old Testament was written first in Hebrew, and later translated to Latin, then to English. Hebrew is an ancient language with many shades of meaning and so for some words there was not a direct Latin equivalent, so a substitute was used. Then when the Latin was translated to early English, there was the same problem. Since then, many bible manufacturers are diligently trying to restore the original meaning, but many others are trying to modify the bible to skew the meanings to fit the folkways of our modern society. The best thing to do is find the Anchor Bible concordances from the 1950's through the 1980's, they are the most comprehsive discussions of the bible that are available. They are even-handed and scholarly written.

2007-05-22 10:41:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

certainly there are a number of stuff in the Bibles of 1919 that are no longer chanced on in the Bibles of 1800, or in the Bibles of 1964 and modern-day variations. between the justifications for different variants is the replace of specific observe meanings. some words used in the previous, are no longer used and conventional anymore. case in point, up until the late 1960's and early 1970's being "gay" meant "being satisfied". immediately, being gay is comparable to being a gay. however the Bible additionally had to be edited as a results of fact each and every time scholars come across an blunders in the interpretation of the classic manuscripts, they celebration to make certain the terrific translation to be put in its place.

2016-11-26 02:08:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I would love to know where you got a hold of a bible that was printed 100 years ago

2007-05-22 10:41:12 · answer #5 · answered by Hunter 2 · 1 0

Funny, I have Bibles dating back to 1853, and they are in complete agreement with my KJV study Bible, which is 3 years old. Try again, it didn't work this time either.

2007-05-22 12:51:43 · answer #6 · answered by Not perfect, just forgiven 5 · 0 0

No.
The three Bibles that I use are reprints of a 4th century text, a 16th century text, and a 17th century text. But I suppose that you might see some differences if you compared those to, say, the TNIV.

2007-05-22 10:39:05 · answer #7 · answered by NONAME 7 · 1 0

Yes, but the majority of people who read the bible would not even admit it.. The bible and the Torah have changed so vastly compared to the Quran, if you look at a Quran from the first one to the last one published this second you will see no changes.

2007-05-22 10:38:12 · answer #8 · answered by je 6 · 0 4

Translations don't really change the meanings. We believe the same things as they did in the 300's.

2007-05-22 10:39:50 · answer #9 · answered by yaabro 4 · 3 0

Its amazing.. the word is truly alive and working. It never changes but the spirit moves in us to share HIS wisdom and insight to our lives. Amazing.

2007-05-22 10:37:48 · answer #10 · answered by tlcbaotou 3 · 5 0

fedest.com, questions and answers