Why isn't in a Science or History Book? why is it in in the Holy Bible a book inspired to men by GOD?
If Scientists claim they can see reason for the parting of the sea or biblical plagues happening, why not put in in a Science Journal?
2007-05-22 05:53:40 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
When it rains in the bible, it is not scientific proof rain exists hun.
I see what you're trying to do, and it's admirable, but for whatever reason (youth? inexperience?) you lack the vocabulary to accurately convey your thoughts.
Go and learn a little bit more about what goes into a journal or science book, then come back and try again.
Good luck.
2007-05-22 05:59:24 · answer #1 · answered by LabGrrl 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Deuteronomy is a book about Moses. It claims right in the text to have been written by Moses. No other book in the Bible makes this claim.
The book is a fraud, written by scribes under King Josiah in the eighth century BCE. He wanted to reform Mosaic Law so he simply wrote a new book and put words in Moses' mouth.
When you understand that this major Biblical book is a deliberate fraud, the rest falls into place pretty quickly.
Moses couldn't have written a book using a version of Hebrew that wouldn't exist until hundreds of years after his death. It was written using the type of Hebrew used when Josiah was King. Moses had been dead for six hundred to 1,000 years.
Not only is it a fake, it isn't a very good one.
2007-05-22 05:58:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Lol, we're not even sure any of that ever actually happened.
There are some scientists who devote their time trying to find natural evidence for the stories told in the Bible. I actually think they are wasting their precious time what could be spend on much more important issues than trying to find proof for a fairy tale, but I guess they are doing you a favor.
If some of those events actually did happen (what I highly doubt), and there is a simple natural explanation for it, then you can finally put down your Bible and start reading useful stuff.
2007-05-22 06:04:33 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I don't see any reason to concoct natural explanations for events that probably didn't happen. Show me convincing evidence that the Red Sea "parted" or that blood rained from the sky, or whatever, and maybe then I'll develop some interest in finding an explanation. Until then, these stories no more bear explanation than does "Puss 'n Boots".
2007-05-22 06:05:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Because there were no scientists back then.
Just a bunch of superstitious people who would have never in a million years thought that thousands of years later people would actually still believe the stuff they made up.
2007-05-22 05:59:18 · answer #5 · answered by Joe M 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They have written them in Science Journals. I just bet those are not the type of publications you receive.
2007-05-22 05:59:30 · answer #6 · answered by punch 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because the crap in the bible is make believe you must not have gotten the memo on that. Have you seen many talking serpents, that whale tale about Jonah is a good one. Its mythology honey that is all it is have a good read
2007-05-22 05:59:11 · answer #7 · answered by Progeny Rising 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Real science could give a rats @$$ about the bible. They really have better things to do.
2007-05-22 06:00:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because in truth most scientists don't give a flying f*ck about biblical fables.
2007-05-22 05:58:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Uh, sweetie, some of those things HAVE been in science journals.
Just thought someone should tell you.
2007-05-22 06:03:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋