Don't you think Science and Archeological Evidence always is evolving proving what is written in the past?

Question

History and Science books are always changing and being updated as historians and scientist uncover more evidence of the past..

The Bible does not change because evidence has been uncovered of it's truth through out the history of the world

In the past years, archealogical evidence as proved many stories in the Bible to possibl be true..

Dead Sea Scrolls for one, Solomon's Temple, lately King Herrod's tomb, The Garden of Eden being located in Iraq.

Scientists even now realize how the Sea was parted by ocean currents, winds as told in the story of Moses, or how the sea might of turned blood red with a fungus that plagued the waters or Locusts that brought fourth massive destruction, these are biblical stories, scientists realize could of very well happened.

How can you say the Bible is full of fairy tales when even Archeologists are finding evidence of biblical truths.

Answer 1

The entire story of Moses, which takes up most of the first five books of the Bible has been discarded as myth by Archaeologists.

Even the University of Tel Aviv discounted the Biblical story based on the Archaeological evidence.

Solomon's Temple was nothing like described. Archaeologists now state that Jerusalem was no larger than 5,000 inhabitants at the time.

No Garden of Eden has been found, but it was likely a Steppe Garden near a Ziggurat. It only proves that the religion of Babylon existed. Temples of Zeus don't prove that Zeus existed.

You are repeating lies when you state that 'Scientists even now realize how the Sea was parted by ocean currents'.

You can find all sorts of propaganda and lies at your local Bible Book Store.

Answer 2

Oh dear gods, where to begin?
You said:
"The Bible does not change because evidence has been uncovered of it's truth through out the history of the world"

Incorrect. The Bible *has* changed, and evidence has not been found.

"In the past years, archealogical evidence as proved many stories in the Bible to possibl be true..
Dead Sea Scrolls for one, Solomon's Temple, lately King Herrod's tomb, The Garden of Eden being located in Iraq."

The Dead sea scrolls weren't a story in the Bible. The Garden of Eden was not located, ever (are you thinking Hanging Garden of Babylon?) The Temple and the Tomb were mentioned OUTSIDE of the Bible. People can also eat sheep and figs, but that doesn't prove the bible.

Answer 3

OK this question's good. I've always said the bibles the oldest history book for the western hemisphere. Now that that is said the nitty gritty. the fact is that most of the archaeologist that are finding the evidence supporting the bible are biblical archaeologists meaning they are guided by religious beliefs in their search and that isn't very scientific at all. Granted somethings can't be denied like the Dead Sea Scrolls I think it took far to long for most to believe them real. but as in all stories and myths from antiquity they are based on actual events just glorified or modified to fit into teachings for use as a guide or tool to control the populous, or just as a story to entertain children and the uneducated population of the rural areas. As far as the parting of the Red sea by Moses it was proved possible by tails that Napoleon crossed the Red Sea by horse. It is a scientific fact that every couple of hundred years wind conditions are favorable for a wall of water to be built at a point were a ridge is at the narrow of the Red Sea. at this spot they have also found Egyptian chariot wheels and other evidence supporting the tale of the crossing. but proof positive has not yet been found. Also as is with most Archeology subject to interpretation.

((davidm
The bible will never change because everthing in it is truth
They will never find a biblical proven lie no matter how much they search. ))

David not all things in the bible are trueth's some are conjections mainly in the old testiments. But the one thing that is a lie but must be taken on faith, is the belief that Jesus was the son of a god! Jesus was a real man no question there it's historical fact that he existed. And he was and still is a GREAT TEACHER but he was just a mortal man.

Answer 4

I have never said that the bible is fairy tales, it is myth. That is a totally different thing.

A fairy tale is fiction written or communicated for fun.

A myth is the taking of a real event or person and using it to illustrate moral or factual information.

However just because a particular event happened it does not make the whole true.

illustration: They have a massive hull in the hills of Turkey, seems that it is of about the time of Noway. However it would be no were big enough to take all the animals clammed in the bible

Answer 5

Listen up....

If science says that the Red Sea can part when the winds are just right, then it is NATURE doing the parting, not your mythological God. When a fungus turns water blood red, its NATURE doing it, not your mythological God. So, archeologists are not finding evidence of Biblical "truths" - because they are not uncovering evidence that God exists - only that physical locations discussed in the Bible ar real...

It used to be bellieved that the City of Troy was nothing more than fiction, written about in Homer's Illiad. Then, it was discovered as being a real place by archeologists. Does that mean that everything else written in the Illiad, including monsters and gods, are real?? Because youre making that claim for the Bible right now....
Same with Harry Potter - those books speak of Big Ben in London. Since Big Ben is a real monument in London, I guess that means boys can be wizards and fly around on broomsticks?

Answer 6

Science is not a defective process that should produce truth, but can't quite get the job done.

It started with pre-scientific beliefs, found various ways of improving them, and have continued doing that, improvements following other improvements, seemingly without end.

All progress in understanding has been accomplished with just the limited, fallible but endlessly self correcting cognitive equipment that human beings have been working with all along.

Science never had the infallibility that simplistic beliefs attributed to it -- it never could have had it, and it never needed to.

Facing the Terrible Truth about Truth will make it easier for you to celebrate that process and you can toss the Bible.

Answer 7

Well, if scientists are finding natural causes and possibilities for all these things, that kinda discounts the "God" aspect of the Bible, don't you think?

People wrote those stories thinking they were miracles or magical, caused by God. People continue to follow the religion because these things were only possible through God magic. If they were just natural occurrences and historically possible, that kinda proves God isn't necessary and the whole religion is unfounded.

So you really don't WANT scientists to find out that parts of the Bible were possible.

Answer 8

If you can check out the history channel's, The stories that didn't make the cut in the bible. If all is from the word of god. Why not includle all the stories. What you deduct from watching this is that the clergy manipulated what stories where going to be included.

Answer 9

The Western Hemisphere is stuffed with archaeological evidence. every person with the skill to do learn can acquire guidance approximately historic inhabitants of the Americas. and that i ask this question: Many community American, Inca, and so on have legends and traditions that a bearded white God recognized to them in this hemisphere. The e book of Mormon additionally makes that declare besides. basically a similarity or concurrence? That on my own is a fascinating piece of evidence.

Answer 10

I don't question that many stories from the Bible have historical roots or influences. But we yell "FAIRY TALE" when we read stuff about women being created from a man's rib, and 500 year old men building a floating zoo, and, y'know, the rest of it...