Yes in differente ways:
HIV vs the world
Hunger vs children in africa
Irak vs Irak vs the world
environmentalists vs industry
which one you belong?
2007-05-22 05:30:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by copita 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your first inkling that WWIII has commenced will be that EMP that knocks out your video game or TV. Unfortunately, WWIII will be global suicide, therefore in answer to your question, as long as there's rational superpowers who believe in MAD, there will be no WW3.
By definition, the next world war wil be nuclear, how could it not. In a nuclear war there will be no winner. In a nuclear world, the only true enemy is war itself.
The next World War will involve a nuclear exchange, how could it not if both sides believe no price for victory will be too high. In the first 30 minutes, nearly a billion people will have been vaporised, mostly in the US, Russia, Europe, China and Japan. Another 1.5 billion will die shortly thereafter from radiation poisoning. The northern hemisphere will be plunged into prolonged agony and barbarity.
Eventually the nuclear winter will spread to the southern hemisphere and all plant life will die. You ask what country would be victorious, you are asking when will we commit global suicide. My answer is it won't happen soon because the larger superpowers are more rational than the rump states in the middle east.
While we hear talk of a nuclear-Iran or a confrontation with NorKor, little is said about the 2 bulls in the glass shop. The arsenals of Russia and the US are enough to destroy a million Hiroshimas. But there are fewer than 3000 cities on the Earth with populations of 100,000 or more. You cannot find anything like a million Hiroshimas to obliterate. Prime military and industrial targets that are far from cities are comparatively rare. Our biggest threat is from an accidental launch by the Russians.
At the point of global suicide, it doesn't matter who is on what side.... In a nuclear age like i said before, the only true enemy is war itself.
2007-05-22 13:08:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Its not me Its u 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yep, China and its satellite countries (Iran, Syria, Venezuela, etc) against ?
China vs. Russia will happen, and the US will either have the option of going with China-would offer a guaranteed win, but the US would be the weaker nation afterward. Or the US could go with Russia, if the US wins then its another Russia/US toss up. Or they could lose and China and its allies win in which case there isnt much to worry about. China is so incredibly racist that it is unlikely non-Chinese would be given much thought.
2007-05-22 05:38:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by Showtunes 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well to be technical the Napoleonic wars were the first true world war. So yea WWII could be considered WWIII.
2007-05-22 05:53:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by trigunmarksman 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well if you consider the Middle East as being part of the world then I guess WW3 is already upon us. Expect to be drafted soon.
2007-05-22 05:26:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. Infidels against Muslims.
2007-05-22 05:25:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Could you be a little more specific? Do you mean the war on terror?
2007-05-22 05:25:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by dawhitfield 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
some say so
http://www.threeworldwars.com/
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/world_war_4.htm
2007-05-22 05:29:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not yet.
2007-05-22 05:26:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
not really
2007-05-22 05:29:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Kevy 7
·
0⤊
0⤋