People keep changing it to fit their agenda.
The quran is protected from change. You should check it out!
2007-05-21 18:22:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by Nunya 5
·
1⤊
4⤋
It's not the content that's changing it's just how it's presented. Here's the verse John 3:16 in a few different translations:
New International Version: "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.
The Message: "This is how much God loved the world: He gave his Son, his one and only Son. And this is why: so that no one need be destroyed; by believing in him, anyone can have a whole and lasting life.
King James Version: "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life".
Nueva Version internanacional: Porque tanto amó Dios al mundo, que dio a su Hijo unigénito, para que todo el que cree en él no se pierda, sino que tenga vida eterna. (Same meaning, but different language!)
I like the message and the New International version the best because they are written in every day words. When Jesus preached he didn't use "Christianese" to sound fancy. He used everyday language. His goal wasn't to impress people but to get his point across.
So, pretty much what I'm trying to say is that even though the bible is in many translations...it has the same meaning.
Some pretty interesting facts about the bible:
-it was written by over 40 different men inspired by God
-written over a period of 1500 years
- it is completely without contradictions
2007-05-21 18:14:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Missy 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
i do no longer see what one area of your question has to do with the different. The manuscript information would not help the assumption of the Bible having been replaced, and nowhere in the Bible does it even hint that something replaced into meant to happen in 2000, nor does it say something approximately 2011, or 2012, or the different "end of the international" style date given.
2016-11-26 00:08:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by byrne 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think some people are truly just trying to make it easier to read by creating versions that are written in more contemporary language. I don't think you can blame them for that, but... who are they to think they know the real meaning enough to change the scriptures? I think we have enough problems with the King James version without a bunch of nuts reading these new versions and specifically finding one that suits their personal agenda.
2007-05-21 17:59:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by rndyh77 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Because the words are translated. Sometimes you can use synonyms to describe on word. Like rapido can mean quickly fast, or hurry. So different versions will use different synonyms. Reading a different version allows you to get a better overall picture of what the author was trying to convey. It kind of triangulates the word.
2007-05-21 18:01:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by The GMC 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Because of satan and religion. Both want to lead you away from God's Word. Religion is the sorriest thing known to man kind.
You check out the website below and you tell me which one is better, the KJB or the NIV
If you believe that the NIV is the Word of God, please answer the following questions.
Do not rely on your memory. As the Bible is the final authority, you must take the answer from the Bible verse (not from footnotes but from the text).
1.Fill in the missing words in Matthew 5:44. “Love your enemies, ___ them that curse you, ____ to them that hate you, and pray for them that ___ and persecute you.”
2.According to Matthew 17:21, what two things are two things are required to cast out this type of demon?
3.According to Matthew 18:11, why did Jesus come to earth?
4.According to Matthew 27:2, what was Pilate’s first name?
5.In Matthew 27:35, when the wicked soldiers parted His garments, they were fulfilling the words of the prophet. Copy what the prophet said in Matthew 27:35 from the NIV.
6.In Mark 3:15, Jesus gave the apostles power to cast out demons and to: ___
7.According to Mark 7:16, what does a man need to be able to hear?
8.According to Luke 7:28, what was John? (teacher, prophet, carpenter, etc.). What was his title or last name?
9.In Luke 9:55, what did the disciples not know?
10.In Luke 9:56, what did the Son of man not come to do? According to this verse, what did He come to do?
11.In Luke 22:14, how many apostles were with Jesus?
12.According to Luke 23:38, in what three languages was the superscription written?
13.In Luke 24:42 what did they give Jesus to eat with His fish?
14.John 3:13 is a very important verse, proving the deity of Christ. According to this verse (as Jesus spoke), where is the Son of man?
15.What happened each year as told in John 5:4?
16.In John 7:50, what time of day did Nicodemus come to Jesus?
17.In Acts 8:37 what is the one requirement for baptism?
18.What did Saul ask Jesus in Acts 9:6?
19.Write the name of the man mentioned in Acts 15:34.
20.Study Acts 24:6-8. What would the Jew have done with Paul? What was the chief captain’s name? What did the chief captain command?
21.Copy Romans 16:24 word for word from the NIV.
22.First Timothy is perhaps the greatest verse in the New Testament concerning the deity of Christ. In this verse, who was manifested in the flesh?
23.In the second part of First Peter 4:14, how do [they] speak of Christ? And, what do we Christians do?
24.Who are the three Persons of the Trinity in First John 5:7?
25.Revelation 1:11 is another very important verse that proves the deity of Christ. In the first part of this verse Jesus said, “I am the A__ and O__, the __ and the ___:”
Conclusion: Little space is provided for answers, but it’s much more than needed. If you followed the instructions above, you not only failed the test, you receive a big goose egg.
(Ed. These are all missing in the NIV.) So now what do you think of your “accurate, easy to understand, up to date Bible”?
This is why Proverbs 30:6, Deuteronomy 4:2, and Revelation 22:18-19 read what they read. “…for ye have perverted the words of the living God…” Jeremiah 23:36. “…let God be true, but every man a liar;” Romans 3:4. “…why call ye me, Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say?” Luke 6:46. “Blessed are they that hear the word of God, and keep it.” Luke 11:28. Not rewrite it…
If you would like to improve your score, and in fact score 100%, you can take this test using the Authorized (King James) Bible.
“And if it be not so now, who will make me a liar, and make my speech nothing worth?” Job 24:25.
Dr. Frank Logsdon was co-founder of The New American Standard Version. As people begin confronting Dr. Logsdon on some the NASV's serious omissions and errors. He re-examined the evidence and this was his verdict:
"I must under God denounce every attachment to the New American Standard Version. I'm afraid I'm in trouble with the Lord . . . I wrote the format . . . I wrote the preface . . . I'm in trouble; . . . its wrong, terribly wrong; its frighteningly wrong . . .The deletions are absolutely frightening . . . there are so many . . . Are we so naive that we do not suspect Satanic deception in all of this?"
Dr. Frank Logsdon
Co-founder, New American Standard Version
Zondervan, the major publisher of the NIV and the catholic church have known for years for what I'm about to state: Other than the comment made about the KJB at the www.chick.com website, if "anyone" can prove that the KJB has mistakes or has flaws in it, there is a one million dollar offer to anyone who can prove it. You understood me right, $1,000,000. That said, before you claim you can prove it, consider this: As much as the catholic church has bad mouthed the Bible over hunderds of years, and has killed people for writing it, not once have they came fore to take up the offer. Zondervan has bad mouth the King James Bible for years because it out sells their NIV and has all but called the KJB a dog because of it. Wouldn't you think, here's their chance to prove that their book is better than the KJ and yet they won't take the offer up? Click on the website below and you will see why.
2007-05-21 18:18:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
The bible has been translated into over 2500 different languages so that all may have one in a language that they read Gorbalizer
2007-05-21 18:27:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by gorbalizer 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Don't blame God for this one.It George Bushes fault.After all everything that goes wrong seems to be Gods fault or President Bush's.No one excepts responsibility for anything.
2007-05-21 19:28:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by don_steele54 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
People are trying to make it easier to read. Ever try reading old English?
2007-05-21 17:58:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Julia B 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Proabably because people think that they can make a better English translation on the one hand and because they want to make money on the other hand.
2007-05-21 17:58:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Martin S 7
·
2⤊
2⤋