I made a posting earlier on here about IRA withdrawals. So this topic relates to IRAs perfectly. There is always a question about which is better. If you are anticipating a lower tax bracket at retirement, then tax deferred(traditional IRA) might be better. If you think that you will be in a higher tax bracket at the time of retirement, then paying current income tax in the hopes of tax free(Roth IRA) withdrawals. But remember, you also pay current income tax on traditional investments also. One reason I tend to favor tax deferred more money is being put to work immediately without taxes, meaning a better return at retirement as oppose to tax free, in which contributions will be taxed annually. If investing$ 5,000 annually, that whole $5,000 goes towards the account. With a Roth, if you pay 20% income tax, that will come out of your contribution, which will leave only $4,000(5,000-20%(1,000)=$4,000). See the difference. Why not go with a traditional?
2007-05-21
15:28:34
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Business & Finance
➔ Taxes
➔ United States
With a traditional, you withdraw money based on your current tax bracket. Why not get another job that doesn't pay much so you will end up in a lower tax bracket after retiring from your main job. Now, instead of paying 20% on withdrawals, you may be paying, say 10-15%. That may not seem like much of a difference, but it could mean thousands, especially if you are already in the 25-38% income tax bracket. Also, if you have a 401(k) plan at your current job, you could diversify retirement by contributing to a Roth. That way, you get tax free and tax deferred withdrawals while in a lower tax bracket. Make sense? First year business major. Came up with that second job concept myself, though it may not be a new one.
2007-05-21
15:36:17 ·
update #1
Another great reason for tax-deferred; with a traditional IRA, your full contributions go towards retirement. With a Roth, you pay taxes on contributions before you even make any money!
2007-05-23
10:30:28 ·
update #2