Paul, then known as Saul, acting on behalf of the rich Jewish oppressors was a Jewish Edomite Pharisee who persecuted the Christians who were renewing their knowledge of the laws and the application of the laws in their daily lives. Disrupting the status quo, the rich oppressors and legalists would have lost their foothold in making money off the poor if the laws were to change and be followed correctly.
Paul said that he had had a `vision' and called himself a
believer in Yahushua however he preached not for but against the social laws and against the social system of the Torah. He preached against material independence, against social security, against freedom from oppression and exploitation.
As Edomite Hillel had infiltrated and changed the Talmud to blindside the Jews to accept oppression, Paul infiltrated the sect of the believers and tried to undo what Yahushua and his followers had done, while using the name of Yahweh to do it. Saul had been tutored by Gamaliel, Hillel's grandson. Both had managed to master the art of deception and lead the people of their time away from the truth of the laws and into oppression.
Paul preached a political ideology to subvert the people and be able to exploit them without hindrance to the status quo. Under the true laws, exploitation was forbidden, but without the laws being applied, the rich could continue to get rich off of the exploitation of the poor. And that's what they did.
The Laws of the Torah gave the people freedom from oppression and exploitation. And every time they wandered away from the laws, they ended up oppressed and exploited, and back into slavery. Much of the same way we as Americans are today. Our government exploits and makes money off the people by unnecessary and inflated taxation, also through exploitive legislation where the rich can become richer, and the poor get poorer. These practices are outlawed in the social system laws of the Torah. Neither has the wealth of America ever been divided out and shared among its people. Our loans are loaded with interest, and there is never forgiveness from unpaid loans. There is freedom in the laws of God while there is slavery, exploitation and manipulation in the laws of man.
It was Paul's teachings against the laws of Yahweh that brought him into conflict with the Judahite believers. The entire area of Asia rejected him. In Revelation the church of Ephesus was praised for recognizing false prophets, yet Paul wrote a letter to the Ephesians as if they were his followers. He could get no where with the Judahite Jews, so he concentrated on gaining converts from gentiles (people who are not (Judahite or Israelite) and who presumably knew nothing or little about the laws of the Torah and who would thus be more likely to follow his teachings without arguing about its content or aware of his deceptions.
Paul's letters (epistles) are the oldest part of the New Testament. It seems that Paul's letters were written about 50 AD and the gospels about 70-100 AD. Paul's letters were never accepted by the early church. The Apostles never mentioned him in their writings, only he includes some of them in his. Yet today our New Testament, configured by a pagan, is dominant with Paul's teachings.
What stands out is that no one before Paul wrote such letters and
taught such things as he did, and no one did so afterwards. His letters give his own point of view and personal ideology and he gives them an authority which they would not otherwise have had by means of a self-proclaimed vision.
The gospels as a whole relate to the life and death of Yahushua but Paul's letters seem to be more a vehicle for pronouncements directed against observance of laws ensuring freedom, independence and equality.
It was the rejected Paul's teachings that were accepted and placed in dominance after 300 years of persecutions wiped out the early church. Even today the Gentile Christians' stories about the beginning of Christianity differ from those of the Judahite Christians. It is the versions of the Gentile Christians which were included in the Christian Canon and became official doctrine. The Torah, Feasts, and Commandments were replaced by the laws of laziness and lawlessness.
There is much to be revealed about Paul and you can read more about how he infiltrated and deceived early believers at http://www.justgivemethetruth.com But was there even a more hideous agenda to Paul than to subvert people away from the teachings of Yahushua and His apostles?
Yahushua is Jesus BTW
2007-05-21 16:30:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Fluffy Wisdom 5
·
4⤊
1⤋
+ Simply, Christianity wouldn't exist.
+ Most would be members of Jesus's original faith - the Nazarenes also known as gnostics.
http://one-faith-of-god.org/new_testament/apocrypha/nazarenes/nazarenes_0010.htm
+ The Dark Ages would never have happened. The motor car would have been invented by at least 600 CE, so today we would have magnetic -gravity vehicles.
+ The Earth would be paradise, there would be no war, no famine and certainly little or no evil to speak of.
+ Sadly, the true message of Jesus did not survive the parasitic movement of Paul of Tarsus that consumed and destroyed his message.
http://one-faith-of-god.org/new_testament/apocrypha/founders_christianity/founders_christianity_0010.htm
+ Maybe, one day, we might see a revival in the true gnostic teachings of Jesus and an end to the evil of Paul of Tarsus? But after 2,000 years, it remains a powerful force...
2007-05-21 20:38:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Paul preached to the gentiles, so we would probably be under the dogma of the other apostles.
JESUS: I am the Way, the Truth and the Life. No man comes to the Father but by Me."
"Hear O Israel, the Lord is our God, the Lord is One"
(Shema Yisrael Adonai eloheinu Adonai ehad)
2007-05-21 15:02:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by St. Mike 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
i think that most of paul's letters were written to try to stop early christians from bickering. i almost felt sorry for him.
he seemed to be trying to reconcile the two jewish communities. (judaism and christianity)
i think that there would be a more forgiving spirit to christianity if paul hadn't written so many letters, but we can't really know that for sure.
eclectic pagan
2007-05-21 22:59:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
i recognize my styles of being a Christian is actuality,yet the different christian are basically incorrect,basically joking,any way its lengthy gone as an instance anybody each and every individual are ideal in theirs own eyes,like quite a few christian faith team imagine they are ideal interior of themselves that's one reason i do no longer stick with any form of team,i'm a Christian because i believe that God deliver his Son as an instance me the thanks to the actuality. different would believe something else yet i do no longer be counted on team i be counted on study further and further about Jesus and showing different the thanks to the actuality. in the adventure that they are prepared to study and listen if no longer I do like basically say turn round and prepare different which have an open ear.
2016-10-18 09:25:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by nelems 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You need to get your facts straight. Luke-Acts is longer than the Pauline epistles. So how can Pauline writings account for more than even a half?
2007-05-21 15:04:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by quillologist 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
2 Peter 3:15-17
2 Tim 3:13-17
God inspired the writers of scripture.He chose who to writr them and wha they should write.Paul was God's man and no one else could have done the job.The scriptures had to be written.
2007-05-21 18:13:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by robert p 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
This is fundementally an un-answerable question. The word of God (father of Jesus) is inspired by God (father of Jesus)- not man. So don't think Paul- think Jesus.
www.loveyouJesus.com
2007-05-21 16:33:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by jesusisking51 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Other than the new testament being smaller, Christianity wouldn't be any different.
2007-05-21 19:02:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋