Don't answer you own question. If you already know the answer, just don't ask. This form is not a stage for your political views. It is a place to get information.
2007-05-21 08:10:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by campbelp2002 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
No- If the congress voted articles of impeachment the President cannot veto. The last case was William Jefferson Clinton.
2007-05-25 12:28:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bill 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, the President can't veto impeachment because it doesn't require his signature or approval (for reasons which I suspect may be obvious.)
2007-05-21 15:20:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by skeptic 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, no more than Clinton could.
History quiz,
How many elected presidents have been impeached?
2007-05-21 20:14:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If that could be done, wouldn't Clinton have done it?
Plus, don't you have to commit a crime or a grevious breech of office to be impeached. Like say, having $100,000 of bribe money in the freezer of your office . . . with tapes of you accepting the bribe money being recorded by the FBI . . . Oh wait, that DEMOCRAT is still an active member of congress and was never chastised by his party. If he is not impeached, really, should anyone be?
2007-05-21 15:14:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by double_8s 1
·
1⤊
2⤋
No, he is not constitutionally permitted to do this. If he is impeached by the House, and removed from office by the Senate, he has no recourse.
2007-05-21 15:09:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by sfhmf 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You mean like Clinton(kof) did?
2007-05-21 15:13:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by FireWing37 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, but given his history, he'd try to attach a "signing statement" to it. {Sigh}
2007-05-21 15:11:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by tmccray45 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bring it on islamo-lover!
2007-05-23 03:30:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Korak 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
He should veto you!
2007-05-21 15:08:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by JT 1
·
0⤊
0⤋