Most of the delay is caused by unforeseen circumstances. Track problems, traffic problems created by the freight trains that share the rails, and Amtrak hits alot of automobiles.
As far as the automobiles are concerned, people are usually nailed when going around crossing gates. They get used to seeing the slow, plodding freight trains pass, they see a headlight coming and figure they have time to make it, then they get nailed because the Amtrak train is traveling at 79 mph or more. Then, its "surprise."
So, schedule change wouldn't help. Chronic delay is just the nature of the beast.
2007-05-21 05:19:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Samurai Hoghead 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I have taken the Southwest Chief several times, from California to Chicago, and did not find it running late.
Within California, I have been on each of the north-south lines, coastal and in the Central Valley, and found them pretty punctual.
Amtrak in general doesn't seem to be any more risky than trying to fly anywhere because the airlines too have crises and delays and cancellations.
Probably Amtrak operates more efficiently in the West, and I suppose the rail services in the East have always been undependable. New York Central was pathetic, and I remember the NYCRR for its dirty cars as well as lateness.
California has the advantage of state involvement in rail services as well as Amtrak, including subsidies.
2007-05-21 07:35:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by fra59e 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
They can't change their schedules because the time varies so much. I've actually been on a train from New Mexico to Chicago, that actually arrived in New Mexico 1 1/2 hour late, and arrived in Chicago 1/2 hour early.
Plus, there are tons of varibles that play into the timing of the trains: Weather, other trains, etc.
2007-05-21 03:48:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Zach 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
You all understand me AND my Conservative perspectives, yet right this is the place I chop up from the %.. Pelosi (as much as i individually dislike her) is third interior the Succession of workplace to the Presidency. it is of a few difficulty for her protection that President Bush desperate to shield the Speaker's transport returned to her District in a militia plane. regrettably, they chosen a airplane that would in maximum situations seat over a hundred passengers in spectacular convenience, yet seeing as the way it is for Madame Pelosi, it is totally provided like a flying palace, finished with a mattress room, loos, a parlor, a eating room, and a galley such as you and that i've got not experienced in something different than a private shape. If it have been my selection, she'd be flying residing house in an air tension owned commuter jet, piloted by utilising an experienced attempt against-veteran pilot. it is basically ordinary experience, yet I see that ordinary experience hasn't been seen everywhere close to Washington for it sluggish now. She flies residing house each and every weekend in that jumbo jet, burning insane ammounts of gasoline. right this is a link:
2016-11-25 21:37:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Weather problems. Track problems. And waiting for freights to get out of the way. AMTRAK has the priority over freights trains, but sometimes there just isn't a handy place for a freight to pull off the main line.
2007-05-21 11:21:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by gromit801 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
am,trak trains are late every where they don't have priority over nothing the slow frieght trains move in and around the passenger trains making the amtrak train wait at a signal so train traffic can move at a go pace they do have train traffic jams by the time a train has gotten up to a good sped the train behind has to slow down and the train behind him makes a chain reaction and it keeps on thats what a lot of frieghts travel at night less train traffic
2007-05-21 06:30:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by accomacgeo 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Because the Union Pacific would just take further advantage of them. Union pacific wants amtrak off it's rails. What would you expect of a corporation that would have Dick Cheney (the vice pres) on its board of directors? Kind of neat how bushie zero funds amtrak year after year and his veep is on it's board. (or was on the board, I'm sure any influence that fastass dickie had went away the second he resigned from the UP board). It all needs to be investigated...
edit edit..The Chief goes all BNSF chi to la. The zephyr goe BNSF chi to den, the gets screwed by the UP den to emy.
2007-05-21 09:08:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by conx-the-dots 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
They like to be late.
2007-05-21 06:55:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by thomas m 5
·
0⤊
1⤋