English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I really don't see the proof of evolution . Find me a a species of animal that's in mid evolutionary state .... Or an old picture of one , or one of those discovery channel people that put specials together about how bones from an older species correlate to the another that evolutionized from it ...You can't , because in my opinion that was just another species that's extinct . Same goes for Humans , why do they have to be connected . Did Cro -magnon really spin into homo-sapien or were they two differant species ?

2007-05-21 01:16:37 · 15 answers · asked by Suicide642 5 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

15 answers

All animals, including humans, are in mid-evolutionary state. We are all gradually changing in response to mate selection, survival of the fittest, and response to our environment. As to viewing the changes, all you need is a microscope, since micro-organisms change more rapidly than larger ones. Penicillin was discovered in historical times; we now have considerable numbers of penicillin resistant strains of bacteria. The ones that had resistance survived, and the ones that did not died out. The change is in the entire population.

Also, domesticated animals show similar changes, but they are not "natural" selection except to the extent that we are ourselves a part of nature. We select the individual animals that have the traits we desire, breed those and neuter (or eat) the others, and the species changes. In the wild, those individual bunny babies who cannot hide from or run from the predatory birds do not live to grow up and breed.

Evolution is not only an observable fact, it is just good sense. A population of plants or animals is constantly changing in response to circumstances in their environment.

2007-05-21 01:27:01 · answer #1 · answered by auntb93 7 · 7 0

The concept of evolution is only a theory and will always be only a theory since there's no way to prove that life just happened by some astronomically improbable coincidence in a primordial soup.

If something as complicated as a life form (even single celled life forms are quite complex) can "just happen", why didn't any less complex objects "just happen" as well? The different metals that can be found on earth are the product of natural forces but it took an intelligent mind to produce something as simple as a fork or spoon.

Here's something else to consider. If all life started in the same place (the "primordial soup") as single celled organisms, then evolved into different life forms and those life forms continued to evolve, culminating in intelligent, civilized, free thinking, clothes-wearing, tool-using humans, why are we the only species to evolve this far? Out of the millions of different plants, mammals, reptiles, insects etc., only man has the above qualities. No other species even comes close.

No other plant or animal has ever developed the written word. None have a consciousness enabling them to even realize they exist (I think, therefore I am).
No other life forms have philosophers, doctors, poets, inventors or theologians.
There isn't a single species that can even be remotely compared to man, other than, in some cases, a somewhat similar humanoid body type.

Why have no other animals invented the wheel?
Why aren't there any animals using some type of "designed" tools? (a few have learned to use rocks or other natural items as tools but that's as close as they get)
Why isn’t there any other life forms contemplating the meaning of life?
Why is it that the next most intelligent species are animals like dolphins and whales?
Why are humans so far advanced compared to the rest of the plant and animal kingdom?
And if the theory was true, why are there still apes in the world if the ones that supposedly evolved into human were the only ones "more fit" to survive. There would have been no need for us to evolve since apes seem to be surviving just fine.

2007-05-21 07:18:12 · answer #2 · answered by Dakota 5 · 0 1

> "Find me a a species of animal that's in mid evolutionary state"

Please explain: What would that look like?

My point: your phrase "mid evolutionary state" is meaningless except in hindsight. We can look at a fossil record and say here are two animals A and C, and this fossil B seems to be an intermediate, or transitional, form between A and C. But if we were to go back in time, there is nothing about B that would indicate that it is in some "mid evolutionary state" ... it's just an animal in its current state of development.

> "Or an old picture of one , or one of those discovery channel people that put specials together about how bones from an older species correlate to the another that evolutionized from it"

("evolutionized"? ... try "evolved").

That's what paleontologists do for a living. They can take two fossils, and based on (a) dating; (b) geographical location; and (c) dozens of physical features, they can get a pretty good picture of whether one fossil represents an ancestor species to the other. They aren't just two "extinct species" ... they have things in common

It's the same idea as when you see a photograph of a child at 8 years old and another photograph of a child at 12 years old and can recognize them as the same child in different stages of development ... you do this by looking for distinctive features in common, even while other things have changed. And once you have made this connection, even if you can't find a photo of the child at 10 years old, you don't just assume that the child was never 10 years old at all!

And you don't just look at a box of 100 photos of a child and assume these must be photographs of 100 completely unrelated children.

Fossils have features that are as distinctive as photographs of a developing child's face. And the dating of the fossils is every bit as conclusive as a date written on the back of a photograph.

----

meredith ... when you say "believers of evolution have been fooled." ... fooled by who? And why? Do you honestly believe that the overwhelming majority of scientists in the world were fooled by one man? Or do you honestly believe they are all (tens of thousands of scientists, for over 150 years) participating in a grand conspiracy to "fool" the general public. Either way you have a *dismally* low opinion of scientists as either universally stupid or universally corrupt. Why do you hate scientists SO MUCH?

2007-05-21 01:20:22 · answer #3 · answered by secretsauce 7 · 4 1

What on earth do you think a 'mid evolutionary state' would be, huh?

Forget the propaganda and nonsense about half dog/half cat - IT DOESN'T WORK LIKE THAT.

Any animal that has ever existed is midway between what it was and what it will become. A few are so ideally suited that they don't change for millions of years, but their relatives do.

The changes happen minutely, over DEEP time. They're the sort of changes that exist between you parents and you - tiny. Mostly they're of no consequence, but once in a blue moon they're advantageous, and spread to be present throughout the population. That's it - no magic transformations.

Want to see an animal that mid-way between an ape and a superman? Go look in a mirror.

And think about how far you still have to go.

CD

2007-05-21 01:28:26 · answer #4 · answered by Super Atheist 7 · 3 0

I guess if you dont believe in evolution you belive that some God created everything ,where is your proof on that , show us the pics of the first people "GOD" put on earth , where didi the rest come from if Adam and Eve were the first 2 People - they obviously slept with their own children to make more people... So i guess you believe in incest as well.....

2007-05-21 01:40:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

" Find me a a species of animal that's in mid evolutionary state .... "

Okay, that would be each and every species you've ever seen.

If you want to consider that "undeniable proof that evolution is fact", then I'm happy to have proven it to you.

2007-05-21 01:34:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Your question quite breaks right down to this: "Given an especially properly known concept that all of us has an identical opinion with, all of us likes, and that works properly for anybody, if some jerk got here alongside with new advice that could desire to disappointed that concept, could technology settle for it?" the respond is, specific! technology is finished of old recommendations that all of us knew have been real, and while sufficient information replaced into presented, technology moved alongside. Evolution, by using the way, isn't comparable to it replaced into while Darwin posited the assumption. lots of what he concept has been supplanted,a nd there are actually different colleges of concept as to how evolution has worked. while greater useful records comes alongside, technology HAS to alter. while i replaced right into a new child, each wellness care expert KNEW that abdomen ulcers have been led to by using rigidity. A researcher got here up with the concept an organism led to ulcers. no one could have faith him, because of the fact they could no longer have faith that any organism could desire to stay to tell the tale interior the tummy. finally, that researcher took a drink of fluid that he knew had the organism in it, and he at present got here down with a case of ulcers. information finally confirmed as much as instruct the guy's factor. at present, all medics recognize that an organism reasons ulcers. some charlatans will attempt to faux the records, yet technology constantly insists that for consequences to have any meaning, they could desire to be "replicable," it quite is, somebody else has to do the test, and it has to yield the acceptable same consequences, or the outcomes are not known. we've had some persons fake records, yet they have been found out and uncovered. there are thousands of scientists obtainable, and that they are purely itching for a super gamble to instruct somebody else's records to be incorrect!

2017-01-10 12:08:21 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

kyralan - answer the part of the question that is relevant as far as I'm concerned Show us a species of animal now that is in mid evolutionary state.

In fact come now Evolution has to be a constant. Why would it stop? Show us a few humans in mid evolutionary state.

2007-05-21 01:27:39 · answer #8 · answered by Tzadiq 6 · 1 4

Your question was: Want proof so where is your proof to the fact ? Then you come with ,I really don't see the proof. So your question makes no sense.

2007-05-21 01:27:19 · answer #9 · answered by norjoh1@verizon.net 1 · 0 0

Persian cats used to not have a flat, butt-face in the early 1900's.

But I guess that's just inbreeding...

Oh no, wait! People in America are evolving into Mexicans! I think it must be evolution or something because everyday there's less non-Mexicans.

2007-05-21 01:25:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers