It is not so much that they Add, it is that certain words are more accurately or less accurately translated etc. And if they omit things from the bible, they still have to, by law, have the omitted verse in asterix and on hand. However, I remember an occation when the catholic church tried to put in a verse with the word Trinity in it. It wasn't allowed to circulate. (In the early eighties in Europe).
2007-05-20 19:05:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Starjumper the R&S Cow 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're not really refuting the Trinity here, just a demonstrating that taking an analogy too far will break it. Just like any other analogy. And Trinitarians don't say that the Father and the Son are the same Person, but that both are God. You're papering over the vast number of prooftexts for the deity of Jesus, such as the Gospel of John's prologue, Thomas' confession of Jesus as his Lord and his God, and so forth.
2016-05-22 16:35:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by anglea 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Here’s a tip about Revelation (Muslims can use it to corner Christians)…
Point 1. Firstly, it says not to add or take away anything from that book, not the bible, but only that “book of prophesy”. Remember that Revelation existed on its own before it got into the NT.
Point 2. They ADDED to that book. What did they add? The rest of the NT.
Point 3. Big trouble for them: plagues, boils on the skin, fire from heaven, much blood, hehe lucky Christians.
2007-05-20 19:13:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
That verse in Revelations refers to unauthorized changes to John's vision. The Bible as a book didn't exist at the time.
2007-05-20 20:33:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bryan Kingsford 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
God has a chosen people that protecting the original Text of the Bible,even some tried to copy and change it they wont succeed,as i told you there is a chosen servants protecting it but this Bible were using Today was based and copy to the original text,and transfered to Languages all over the world
2007-05-20 19:14:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
All translations are written by people experienced in exegesis of the original Greek Septuagint or Latin Vulgate.
Read up on Bible translation accuracy you might be surprised.
Pbuh?
2007-05-20 19:05:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I beleive that, in context of what John was saying, he was referring to his revelation that he was writing down. Not the entire Bible.
2007-05-20 19:08:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jimmy R 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Punter, you don't know the Bible well enough to quote from it, dude. John had no idea that there would be a Bible.
2007-05-20 19:06:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Christian Sinner 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Jesus Who?
2007-05-20 19:03:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes, meaning the book is not divinely protected.
IT can be changed.
;
2007-05-20 19:04:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋