2007-05-20 16:48:30 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
aks bush, he is cleaver or not?????????
2007-05-20 16:52:09 · answer #1 · answered by jette n 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Saddam was in the wrong, just look at all the violations he made under the cease fire agreement (16-18 different things or activities he was not allow to do/continue). He never let the UN search unrestricted as was required for his weapons stock piles. Our planes and the British where being fired upon on a monthly, then weekly basis enforcing the no fly zone. If you sign a agreement advising that you will do/allow certain things or activities you had better follow it. We made it clear we were not attacking Iraq's civilians but attacking there leader and government body that continued to defy UN regulations after several years of new second chances. That is why the civilians population viewed us and saviors when we first over took the country. Personally what needs to be done, we need to get out of the city's and let their government enforce the law while we close and watch the boarders to prevent new problems coming in. They would eventually get things reined in. Then after they have a military that could stand on its own, IE protect them against Iran and Syria, we can safely leave.
2016-05-22 15:52:33 · answer #2 · answered by nadia 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
None, They don't come out of the federal budget. Local towns and states have to come up with their state money for schools, that is why state spending on education varies so much.
Hospitals might be partially financed by local governments but not by federal and they are usually privately owned by a company. Roads are also state.
If you understood anything about how government works you wouldn't be stupid enough to ask this.
2007-05-20 17:41:48 · answer #3 · answered by inzaratha 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The money that is used to fight the war comes from the
military budget, roads come from states budget and
hospitals are privately owned.
The Government will supplement large road projects but
that money comes from the general fund or by allocation
by congress.
So the answer to your question is no more than what is
currently being built or currently planned
2007-05-20 17:00:06 · answer #4 · answered by justgetitright 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
It's kind of a moot point. Even if we weren't building all those things for the people in Iraq (and we are), they still wouldn't have been built here. Hey, why give us taxpayers anything for our money? Our govt. must have never heard the one that goes "charity begins at home."
2007-05-20 16:56:55 · answer #5 · answered by frankiquilts 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
"Last year, the vice president launched a new effort to help make communities more liberal." —Bill Clinton, during his 2000 State of the Union Speech. He meant to say "more livable," and then made the same slip-up in a subsequent sentence, drawing uproarious laughter from Republicans
apparently he didn't miss your city.
2007-05-20 16:59:32 · answer #6 · answered by surferlove =) 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
How many schools, roads and hospitals could we build if we didn't have to send out all those welfare checks every month?
2007-05-20 16:54:02 · answer #7 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 4⤊ 4⤋
No more than we have since we attacked Iraq.
2007-05-20 16:53:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
How people could change there own lives if they wanted too? They don't want to they vote democrat and ask the people who work to pay for there drug habits.
2007-05-20 16:55:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Sorry, I cannot help you with this because infinity is an undefined number.
2007-05-20 16:51:52 · answer #10 · answered by jhartmann21 4 · 1⤊ 5⤋
Thousands more than we would have ever used. Pops
2007-05-20 16:51:11 · answer #11 · answered by Pops 6 · 1⤊ 5⤋